Pass, invite, game?
#1
Posted 2008-August-28, 14:08
♠xxx ♥AQxxx ♦Qxx ♣Qx
Partner opens 1♦ (standard), you bid 1♥ and partner raises to 2♥.
Now what?
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#2 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-August-28, 14:11
#3
Posted 2008-August-28, 14:11
I might bid game if 2♥ showed 4♥.
#4 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-August-28, 14:12
Echognome, on Aug 28 2008, 03:11 PM, said:
Yeah I guess it's relevant how often partner raises with a 3 card heart suit in a balanced hand (if he has raised with 3 and an unbal hand I still like my hand a lot). My answer is assuming "normal" tendencies, that is...normal to me
#5
Posted 2008-August-28, 14:15
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#6
Posted 2008-August-28, 14:25
#7
Posted 2008-August-28, 14:44
Playing MP, you may convince me to pass.
The LTC count is 8, the Queens are indicating
a downgrade, partner showes a min, i.e. 7-8 LTC
count, given that you play strong NT, 8 is an real
option, hence 2 may be the limit.
Throw in regular 3 card raises, and you may have
made your case, ... playing MP.
Playing IMPs, I would not want to explain 2H+2,
even if I am convinced that it would be the long
time winner, may tell you something about me
and my complementaries.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#8
Posted 2008-August-28, 14:54
#10
Posted 2008-August-28, 15:23
mike777, on Aug 28 2008, 04:17 PM, said:
3D
Lol Wouldn't KISS dictate just bid game and try to make it, rather than make a game invitation that forces partner to evaluate, and one on which there isn't even complete consensus whether it's forcing or not?
#11
Posted 2008-August-28, 15:50
pclayton, on Aug 28 2008, 03:54 PM, said:
What Phil said.
Call me Desdinova...Eternal Light
C. It's the nexus of the crisis and the origin of storms.
IV: ace 333: pot should be game, idk
e: "Maybe God remembered how cute you were as a carrot."
#12
Posted 2008-August-31, 13:38
Game try for me.
#13
Posted 2008-August-31, 16:24
- hrothgar
#14
Posted 2008-August-31, 22:40
jdonn, on Aug 28 2008, 04:23 PM, said:
mike777, on Aug 28 2008, 04:17 PM, said:
3D
Lol Wouldn't KISS dictate just bid game and try to make it, rather than make a game invitation that forces partner to evaluate, and one on which there isn't even complete consensus whether it's forcing or not?
I have known since the "beginning of time" that zig-zag auction is forcing (them silent, 1D-1H-2H-3D). Surprised very much to hear jdonn think that there is no consensus whether it is forcing. Is the non-forcing idea something totally new?
#15
Posted 2008-August-31, 23:06
peachy, on Aug 31 2008, 11:40 PM, said:
jdonn, on Aug 28 2008, 04:23 PM, said:
mike777, on Aug 28 2008, 04:17 PM, said:
3D
Lol Wouldn't KISS dictate just bid game and try to make it, rather than make a game invitation that forces partner to evaluate, and one on which there isn't even complete consensus whether it's forcing or not?
I have known since the "beginning of time" that zig-zag auction is forcing (them silent, 1D-1H-2H-3D). Surprised very much to hear jdonn think that there is no consensus whether it is forcing. Is the non-forcing idea something totally new?
I have always believe forcing is standard, but past threads (and experience) show that not everyone agrees. In any case that wasn't really my point. He said "KISS" then chose the more complicated option.
#16
Posted 2008-September-01, 00:07
♠A9xx ♥KJx ♦Kxxx ♣xx
I was fairly lucky to get out for down one. The hand passed out at the other table, lose three.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#17
Posted 2008-September-01, 00:13
awm, on Sep 1 2008, 01:07 AM, said:
♠A9xx ♥KJx ♦Kxxx ♣xx
I was fairly lucky to get out for down one. The hand passed out at the other table, lose three.
Late night I bet I should not ask this but I do sigh.......
This is an honest question.
Is one d really standard expert opening in first seat?
Yes I know this is a fine lite opening bid...just wonder if otherwise standard opening.
I open this playing 2/1 =14 hcp but I do not think that is expert standard on bbo forums.
#18
Posted 2008-September-01, 00:16
mike777, on Sep 1 2008, 01:13 AM, said:
I will say that I was somewhat disappointed with partner's hand, and that I would not have opened this hand in first chair playing 2/1. Note that if you add the ♦J to partner's hand then 3♥ has an outside shot at making and at least going down more than one is unlikely.
Hard to say what "standard expert" means of course.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#19
Posted 2008-September-01, 00:17
mike777, on Sep 1 2008, 08:13 AM, said:
awm, on Sep 1 2008, 01:07 AM, said:
♠A9xx ♥KJx ♦Kxxx ♣xx
I was fairly lucky to get out for down one. The hand passed out at the other table, lose three.
Late night I bet I should not ask this but I do sigh.......
This is an honest question.
Is one d really standard expert opening in first seat?
Yes I know this is a fine lite opening bid...just wonder if otherwise standard opening.
No, it's not standard. It's a style question. Among experts there are light openers and solid openers. Helness-Helgemo would pass this, for example.
I'm far from in their league, but with my latter partner this was an obvious opening - 1♣ (2+) in our methods. With another previous partner, where we had a very solid opening style, this was far from an opening bid.
Harald
#20
Posted 2008-September-01, 00:19
1d=1h
1s=1nt(not good enough to invite)
p

Help
