Does anyone have a good structure over a 2♦ strong and unlimited opening?
Maybe "good" is too much to ask for when you start this high - how about a workable structure.
Page 1 of 1
GF 2D Structure
#1
Posted 2008-September-01, 20:37
Wayne Burrows
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#2
Posted 2008-September-01, 20:41
Many frenchs play 2D as GF.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#3
Posted 2008-September-01, 21:21
Bocchi-Duboin:
2♥: waiting
2♠: 5+♥s
2NT: 5+♠s
3♣: 5+♦s
3♦: 5+♣s
In 04 and 05 was 3♣=6+♦s, 3♦=6+♥s
See also ETM Gold pages 30 and 92-93.
However do you perhaps mean 2♦ is strong, unlimited, and natural?
2♥: waiting
2♠: 5+♥s
2NT: 5+♠s
3♣: 5+♦s
3♦: 5+♣s
In 04 and 05 was 3♣=6+♦s, 3♦=6+♥s
See also ETM Gold pages 30 and 92-93.
However do you perhaps mean 2♦ is strong, unlimited, and natural?
'I hit my peak at seven' Taylor Swift
#4
Posted 2008-September-01, 22:09
glen, on Sep 2 2008, 03:21 PM, said:
However do you perhaps mean 2♦ is strong, unlimited, and natural?
No not natural
Wayne Burrows
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#5
Posted 2008-September-01, 22:12
glen, on Sep 2 2008, 03:21 PM, said:
Bocchi-Duboin:
2♥: waiting
2♠: 5+♥s
2NT: 5+♠s
3♣: 5+♦s
3♦: 5+♣s
In 04 and 05 was 3♣=6+♦s, 3♦=6+♥s
2♥: waiting
2♠: 5+♥s
2NT: 5+♠s
3♣: 5+♦s
3♦: 5+♣s
In 04 and 05 was 3♣=6+♦s, 3♦=6+♥s
Yes I found Bocchi Duboin.
Curiously their card says for 2♦ that it shows a minimum of 2 diamonds. Does this mean that their game force is is based on a balanced hand at therefore that their 1-level openings are unlimited.
Wayne Burrows
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#6
Posted 2008-September-02, 04:11
In Rosencranz' "Standard International" (anyone can feel free to correct this, I'm going on memory):
2♥ - 0-1 controls
2♠ - 2 controls
2N - 3 controls
3♣ - 4 controls
3♦ - 5+ controls
3♥ - Minimum 5-5 in majors
3♠ - Better 5-5 in the majors
3N - 7 card minor; 2 of top 3 honors (nothing else)
4♣/4♦ - 5M5M-3[m]
4M - 7 card major; 2 of top 3 (nothing else)
Schenken 2♦:
2♥ - no Aces
2♠, 2N, 3♣, 3♦ - That ace (NT = ♥). 3♥+ = That ace + one higher (I think)
The next suit scans for Kings, and then Q's.
2♥ - 0-1 controls
2♠ - 2 controls
2N - 3 controls
3♣ - 4 controls
3♦ - 5+ controls
3♥ - Minimum 5-5 in majors
3♠ - Better 5-5 in the majors
3N - 7 card minor; 2 of top 3 honors (nothing else)
4♣/4♦ - 5M5M-3[m]
4M - 7 card major; 2 of top 3 (nothing else)
Schenken 2♦:
2♥ - no Aces
2♠, 2N, 3♣, 3♦ - That ace (NT = ♥). 3♥+ = That ace + one higher (I think)
The next suit scans for Kings, and then Q's.
"Phil" on BBO
#7
Posted 2008-September-02, 05:52
Standard french bidding over 2♦ GH is along these lines :
- 2♥ no Ace
- 2♠ Ace of Heart or Spade
- 2NT 8+ HCP
- 3♣ Ace of club
- 3♦ A of Diamond
-3♥ through 3NT 2 aces (same color, rank, mixed)
some variation aound that scheme exist but do not think there are a big improvement; think you strike gold every three year or so but otherwise the approach is flawed (no to mention it requires a lot of work to deal with subsequent bidding for something which happens very rarely)
- 2♥ no Ace
- 2♠ Ace of Heart or Spade
- 2NT 8+ HCP
- 3♣ Ace of club
- 3♦ A of Diamond
-3♥ through 3NT 2 aces (same color, rank, mixed)
some variation aound that scheme exist but do not think there are a big improvement; think you strike gold every three year or so but otherwise the approach is flawed (no to mention it requires a lot of work to deal with subsequent bidding for something which happens very rarely)
#8
Posted 2008-September-02, 05:54
I think it depends on what the 2♦ opening shows.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
Page 1 of 1

Help
