Mo-Mo-Mo-Monster hand!
#1
Posted 2008-August-23, 02:01
AKQ KJ A KQJ10xxx
P - P - 3♥ - ? What's your plan?
How about after 1♥?
#3
Posted 2008-August-23, 03:33
#4
Posted 2008-August-23, 03:39
#5
Posted 2008-August-23, 03:43
The_Hog, on Aug 23 2008, 03:39 AM, said:
Hmm, actually I change my mind. If partner doesn't have an ace, I don't make 5 either, so bidding 5 seems rather pointless. 6♣.
#6 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-August-23, 03:48
cherdano, on Aug 23 2008, 04:43 AM, said:
The_Hog, on Aug 23 2008, 03:39 AM, said:
Hmm, actually I change my mind. If partner doesn't have an ace, I don't make 5 either, so bidding 5 seems rather pointless. 6♣.
What? Your opps lead REALLY well and your partners suck at having 3 clubs or the 9 of clubs or a stiff heart etc...
#9
Posted 2008-August-23, 08:07
TimG, on Aug 23 2008, 01:28 PM, said:
No, it shows minors.
#10
Posted 2008-August-23, 08:50
#11
Posted 2008-August-23, 09:00
Flameous, on Aug 23 2008, 03:01 AM, said:
AKQ KJ A KQJ10xxx
P - P - 3♥ - ? What's your plan?
How about after 1♥?
....
I've just read CSGibson's answer, and I like that idea better than mine (above)
Double then bid 4N (3041 RKCB) provided partner
- Expects me to improvise this way.
- Doesn't decide to treat a ♣ void as a useful Ace

#13
Posted 2008-August-23, 09:40
I'll tell what happened in our table. I was the 3♥ opener. Afterwards came
4♥ - P - 4♠ - P -
4NT - P - 5♦ - P -
6♣ - P - 6♠ - P -
6NT - AP
Other table harder time...
P - P - 2♥ - X -
5♥ - P - P - ?
While one table had easy time and still failed...
P - P - 1♥ - X -
P - 1♠ - P - 5♣ -
AP
#14
Posted 2008-August-23, 12:19
helene_t, on Aug 23 2008, 09:07 AM, said:
TimG, on Aug 23 2008, 01:28 PM, said:
No, it shows minors.
Well then, 4C must be Gerber, right?
#15
Posted 2008-August-23, 12:32
TimG, on Aug 23 2008, 08:19 PM, said:
helene_t, on Aug 23 2008, 09:07 AM, said:
TimG, on Aug 23 2008, 01:28 PM, said:
No, it shows minors.
Well then, 4C must be Gerber, right?
Strike two.
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
#16
Posted 2008-August-23, 12:34
#17 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-August-23, 15:20
#18
Posted 2008-August-24, 01:25
TimG, on Aug 24 2008, 12:28 AM, said:
It is for me.
We play 4♥ for the minors and 4♣/♦ for major/minor two-suiters.
So this hand is perfect I bid 4NT and pass 5♣ and bid 6♣ or 7NT over one or two aces.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#19
Posted 2008-August-25, 11:34
After 3H, it depends a little on method, do you play
4C as 2-suiter or not, but I guess, even if not, the
hand is too strong for 5C (or 3NT, and 3NT may be
down, if partner does not show up with the Ace of clubs).
Similar after 1H.
With kind regards
Marlowe
PS: Missed the point, that partner is a passed hand, but this
does not change my bids, although slam got more unlikely.
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#20
Posted 2008-August-25, 11:38
Flameous, on Aug 23 2008, 10:40 AM, said:
<snip>
Why should I?
Do we have game, most likely, but not certain,
afterall the 3H was in 3rd seat, and this means,
he could fool around in both directions.
Do we have a sure slam? See the answer above.
If partner passes, it will be ok.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)

Help
