Your call?
8 cards support
#3
Posted 2008-August-09, 19:36
#4
Posted 2008-August-09, 19:43
Just to confirm that was not a terrible bid.
#5
Posted 2008-August-09, 20:34
Just kidding. 4H also.
#6
Posted 2008-August-09, 20:45
I guess following these rules work
#7
Posted 2008-August-10, 00:54
#8
Posted 2008-August-11, 12:25
- hrothgar
#9
Posted 2008-August-11, 12:36
EricK, on Aug 10 2008, 01:54 AM, said:
If he has an uncontrolled suit and clearly bad trumps, I'm not that worried about what he expects since I know what he will do!
#10
Posted 2008-August-11, 14:35
han, on Aug 11 2008, 01:25 PM, said:
Not really. Suppose that instead of opening 1♣, partner had opened 1NT (weak), which is after all by far the most likely hand type for him when the auction starts in this way. Would you be amused if I, as your partner, failed to consider the idea of playing in 3NT? Would you fail to consider the idea yourself?
And sealed the Law by vote,
It little matters what they thought -
We hang for what they wrote.
#11
Posted 2008-August-11, 15:35
But not only has partner opened in our 8-card suit, the opponents have also bid hearts, the suit in which we have a void. We cannot show our support and shortness below 3NT. It seems madness to aim for 3NT.
- hrothgar
#12
Posted 2008-August-11, 21:35
I prefer 3♥ and then 4♣ over most continuations. This way we'll get more information out of the weak NT across the table.
#13
Posted 2008-August-12, 05:51
EricK, on Aug 10 2008, 07:54 AM, said:
I think a splinter in a contested auction is less well-defined than a splinter in a contested auction*. This is because we cannot go slow with such great support - opps are likely to bid 4♥ before our next turn.
*Other things being equal, that is. In an uncontested auction, maybe 3♥ rather than 4♥ would be the splinter.

Help

1♣-(2♥)-??