BBO Discussion Forums: What's Standard? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

What's Standard?

#1 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,725
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2008-August-05, 06:17

Last night I got dealt roughly

♠ xx
♥ AKx
♦ xx
♣ xxxxx

The auction progressed as follows

1N* - (X) - P** - (2♣)
P - (2♥) - All pass

Partner opened a 12-14 HCP 1NT
My Pass did not force a redouble

What do you expect that X, 2♣, and 2♥ show?
Alderaan delenda est
0

#2 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,401
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2008-August-05, 06:26

Standard is certainly that dbl is penalty, 2♣ is a very weak hand with 5+ clubs, and 2♥ is a very good hand with 5+ hearts.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#3 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,483
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2008-August-05, 07:02

Call the director, you only have 12 cards

In a country where the weak NT is common, standard is

Double is penalties, usually 16+ if balanced or looking at a probable 7 tricks
2C shows a very bad hand with club length
2H shows a desire to play in 2H opposite a bad hand with club length - I don't think it shows anything more than the original double.

One fairly common alternative is to play 2C as artificial, either 'scramble' (a generally bad hand that does not want to defend), or as 'stayman' (a generally bad treatment)
0

#4 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,228
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-August-05, 07:19

Hi,

Without agreements:
X is penalty, 2C a weak bid, 2H to play.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#5 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2008-August-05, 08:50

FrancesHinden, on Aug 5 2008, 08:02 AM, said:

Call the director, you only have 12 cards

In a country where the weak NT is common, standard is

Double is penalties, usually 16+ if balanced or looking at a probable 7 tricks
2C shows a very bad hand with club length
2H shows a desire to play in 2H opposite a bad hand with club length - I don't think it shows anything more than the original double.

One fairly common alternative is to play 2C as artificial, either 'scramble' (a generally bad hand that does not want to defend), or as 'stayman' (a generally bad treatment)

I think that if one of the meanings of X is a good long suit and a side entry, then 2♣ has to be scramble. It's more important to get to play at the 2 level than for the running man to be able to show length in clubs.
0

#6 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,401
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2008-August-05, 08:54

But if the dbl can also be a strong balanced hand, 2♣ leads to nothing. Besides, the hands that might want to scramble would be balanced hands, but those can tolerate that doubler leads his long suit so defending should be ok.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#7 User is offline   bid_em_up 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,351
  • Joined: 2006-March-21
  • Location:North Carolina

Posted 2008-August-05, 14:54

I'm curious. Why don't you just ask your opponents instead of attempting to guess what their bids mean?

.
Is the word "pass" not in your vocabulary?
So many experts, not enough X cards.
0

#8 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,401
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2008-August-05, 16:57

my guess is the opponents answered "we play standard methods" :)
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#9 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-August-05, 18:22

bid_em_up, on Aug 5 2008, 03:54 PM, said:

I'm curious. Why don't you just ask your opponents instead of attempting to guess what their bids mean?

.

Maybe the problem is posed more as a trivia or fun format instead of at the table format, just to see if we can actually figure it out.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#10 User is offline   brianshark 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 895
  • Joined: 2006-May-13
  • Location:Dublin
  • Interests:Artificial Intelligence, Computer Games, Satire, Football, Rugby... and Bridge I suppose.

Posted 2008-August-06, 02:18

As far as I know, standard means that Dbl is 15+ pts and a fairly balanced hand. 2♣ is just ♣s with no desire to defend 1NTx opposite a 15/16 count. 2♥ just showed that the fairly balanced 15/16 count happened to have a decent 5 card suit and is suggesting we play there.
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users