the blame game
#21
Posted 2008-August-01, 20:25
- chances of West having real diamonds are greatly diminished
- even if he does, chances of East leading a diamond are greatly diminished
Fred Gitelman
Bridge Base Inc.
www.bridgebase.com
#22
Posted 2008-August-01, 23:19
fred, on Aug 1 2008, 09:25 PM, said:
- chances of West having real diamonds are greatly diminished
- even if he does, chances of East leading a diamond are greatly diminished
Well, on this occasion if he doesn't lead a diamond he will probably lead a spade, and that might not be so good for your side either. Only on rare occasions will he try a club from such as ♣Jx - "my LHO has the majors, my RHO has diamonds stopped, but what these fools do not know is that sometimes my partner opens 1♦ with a long club suit."
Not that this means I would not bid 1NT with the North hand - I would. After all, you can scarcely expect me of all people to violate the Law of Total Trumps by risking 2♣ on a possible 4-2 fit.
And sealed the Law by vote,
It little matters what they thought -
We hang for what they wrote.
#23
Posted 2008-August-02, 03:02
Jlall, on Aug 2 2008, 02:49 AM, said:
I don't like 6432 hands as well DIRECTOR!
#24 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-August-02, 03:10
hotShot, on Aug 2 2008, 04:02 AM, said:
Jlall, on Aug 2 2008, 02:49 AM, said:
I don't like 6432 hands as well DIRECTOR!
Not sure if this is a joke but obviously I was talking about 6432 of diamonds not 6432 shape...
#25
Posted 2008-August-02, 03:52
Jlall, on Aug 2 2008, 11:10 AM, said:
hotShot, on Aug 2 2008, 04:02 AM, said:
Jlall, on Aug 2 2008, 02:49 AM, said:
I don't like 6432 hands as well DIRECTOR!
Not sure if this is a joke but obviously I was talking about 6432 of diamonds not 6432 shape...
Well if there are 15 cards in diamonds, I would call the director too.
#26
Posted 2008-August-02, 07:57
P_Marlowe, on Aug 1 2008, 04:22 PM, said:
rogerclee, on Aug 1 2008, 04:18 PM, said:
P_Marlowe, on Aug 1 2008, 02:16 PM, said:
rogerclee, on Aug 1 2008, 04:13 PM, said:
2) 1NT also lies about some values in DIAMONDS?!?!
Sure, but also tells something about the shape,
and 9xxx is ok as stopper, I would prefer 10xxx,
but 9xxx will do as well.
Of course 2C works pretty well on the given hand,
because our partner happens to hold 4 clubs, as it
is, clubs is the first suit he would lie, if he had too.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Partner could also have a singleton diamond too. I don't understand this argument, yes he could be 4432 even. Again you are thinking of the worst possible scenario and not the most common scenarios.
Partner holding a bal. hand should be pretty
common.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Thinking about my arguments, there is one point I
missed, and I am not aware it was already raise in
the previous posts:
The guy, who made the reoping t/o would bid 1NT
with lots of bal. hands in the 11/12-14 range ( or
11/12-16 range - take your pick), even without a
diamond stopper, the only exeption being 44 in the
majors, hence the likelihood that partner is really
short in diamond increases, and similar the likelihood
that he has at least 4 clubs increases.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)

Help
