LMP, day one
#1
Posted 2008-July-21, 23:33
You are dealer and pick up
♠ xx ♥AKJx ♦T9xx ♣Kxx. You decide to pass as dealer (it is close in your style) and the bidding goes
P (1S) P P
X (P) 2D (2S)
?
Do you take another bid?
#2
Posted 2008-July-22, 00:36
#3
Posted 2008-July-22, 01:47
If partner passes this out, it won't surprise me at all to find that both 2♠ and 3♦ are one down.
#4
Posted 2008-July-22, 02:24
BTW, if partner doubled at balancing seat, what kind of hand did he has?
#5
Posted 2008-July-22, 04:38
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#7
Posted 2008-July-22, 05:00
As it is, I dont know who has max., opener,
reponder or partner, partner on the other
hand did hear me, although he may give me
a slightly weaker hand and knows his hand.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#8
Posted 2008-July-22, 05:02
Edmunte1, on Jul 22 2008, 05:59 AM, said:
Antifield?
I would say opening is antifield.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#9
Posted 2008-July-22, 05:39
-P.J. Painter.
#10
Posted 2008-July-22, 07:16
#11
Posted 2008-July-22, 09:16
I have one more diamond than I promised, but I have two spades where I might have one or zero. Besides, partner knows my hand way better than I know his. Even if all this didn't make it clear, on top of it all, we're red!
#13
Posted 2008-July-22, 11:43
LHO opened 1♠ and it went pass, pass back to you. RHO is weak. Over your double, LHO passed. LHO does not have a great hand, so partner has the balance of power - probably close to an opening bid himself.
Partner bid 2♦ - it is matchpoints, so he would bid 1NT with any good excuse. He does not jump because you could be considerably weaker for your balancing double.
I do not want to defend 2♠ on this hand. It could be right to pass, but bidding looks better to me. Partner will not expect quite this good a hand for your balance, so he may choose to pass out 2♠ at this vulnerability. +110 is better than +100 (2Sx down one or 2S down 2). Bidding is only wrong when both sides go down, or your side goes down 200 (doubled or not), and I don't expect to be -200 in 3♦ on this auction.
#14
Posted 2008-July-22, 13:18
mike777, on Jul 22 2008, 12:36 AM, said:
At the table, I was 100% sure opponents were in an 8 card fit. (RHO probably passed because he didn't have 6 hcp.)
#15
Posted 2008-July-22, 14:01
We chose to pass: a reasonable decision.. I would have passed as well, unless playing weak 1N (which I like precisely because I get to open, guilt-free). Having decided that discretion was the better part of valour on this hand, have I learned enough to change my mind?
I don't think so. Bidding 3♦ is a statement that my hand is now worth an opening bid, and it really hasn't gone up that much.. make it a 10-11 count 1=4=5=3, and that would be a 3♦ call.
I recognize that defending 2♠ may turn out badly, but partner is still there and knows of my short spades... give him a decent 3=2=4=4 or 3=2=5=3 and he may well bid again. If he has Art's possible near-opening (and I agree that he might) I don't expect him to go quietly
#16
Posted 2008-July-22, 14:12
What's lefty up to? Was he trying to take a piece out of whatever my partner bid or is he just a better than min?
Tiebreaker, I'm playing with a good partner in the LM pairs and he knows just as well as I do that defending here could be really bad.
I pass.
#17
Posted 2008-July-22, 22:28

Help
