BBO Discussion Forums: Warm-up for Vegas Life Masters - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Warm-up for Vegas Life Masters

#1 User is offline   sathyab 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 575
  • Joined: 2006-November-07

Posted 2008-July-17, 01:04

Scoring: MP


The bidding goes

p 1h p 2h
p p p p

You hate passing at your second turn, but let's say you do considering your pathetic spades.

Partner leads the ♦3, playing 3/5 vs suits, as declarer calls for the deuce from dummy. What're your thoughts about the lead and the hand ? And your play at T1.
Seeking input from anyone who doesn't frequently "wtp", "Lol" or post to merely "Agree with ..."
0

#2 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2008-July-17, 02:10

Declarer probably has only five hearts, because partner didn't bid.

♦K would be necessary if declarer had something like Kx KQ10xx A10x xxx. That would give partner Axxx Jxx Qxx Axx, which makes the lead believable.

I can't see any benefit to playing low - it doesn't look like we're going to force declarer off, and there's no risk of partner being endplayed.

I play ♦K.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#3 User is offline   sathyab 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 575
  • Joined: 2006-November-07

Posted 2008-July-17, 12:58

gnasher, on Jul 17 2008, 03:10 AM, said:

Declarer probably has only five hearts, because partner didn't bid.

♦K would be necessary if declarer had something like Kx KQ10xx A10x xxx.  That would give partner Axxx Jxx Qxx Axx, which makes the lead believable.

I can't see any benefit to playing low - it doesn't look like we're going to force declarer off, and there's no risk of partner being endplayed.

I play ♦K.

Problems of this kind seem to draw a very limited response, one to be exact so far, so I'll spoil it for anyone who was holding out just to test me :blink:

Yes, my thoughts were similar although not as exhaustive at the table. It didn't seem reasonable to play low as we might end up with no Diamond tricks at all. From declarer's failure to try the ♦9 at T1, partner hasn't led from QT3, probably Q63 or T63. So I too played the King. Disaster, as partner had led from T63 :blink: Partner's hand was Axx Jxx T63 Axxx.
Declarer's hand: Kxx KQTxx AQx xx. He discarded a ♣ on the 13th ♦, so defense wound up with the two black Aces.

It occurred to me later that when declarer has Kx KQTxxx ATx xxx, partner's hand would have been Axxx Jxx Qxx Axx. Would he try balancing with 2♠ with that ?

Several people led a trump on the go and did better. Unfortunately so did the Ace-bangers regardless of which suit they chose to plunk down. I think partner's lead wasn't totally unreasonable as in so many of these auctions dummy puts down something like KQJxx of clubs and you wish you could take back your trump lead.
Seeking input from anyone who doesn't frequently "wtp", "Lol" or post to merely "Agree with ..."
0

#4 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2008-July-17, 13:13

With partner's actual hand, I am always leading a diamond.
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#5 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-July-17, 14:50

You shouldn't feel bad about this, if declarer were any competent (or awake) he would have played ♦9, forcing three tricks in the suit for him anyway. You can't punish every mistake.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users