Easy Everyday Problem
#1
Posted 2008-July-03, 23:59
♠Qxx ♥x ♦xxxxx ♣QTxx
(1♥) - 2♣ - (2♥) - ?
Edit: Changed ♠K->♠Q.
#2
Posted 2008-July-04, 00:32
#3 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-July-04, 00:56
#4
Posted 2008-July-04, 01:00
Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.
#5
Posted 2008-July-04, 01:08
Both are going at least down 1, but 3NT is down a ton on a switch after the heart lead. Partner has ♠x ♥KQxx ♦QJ ♣AKJxxx
#6 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-July-04, 01:18
Jlall, on Jul 4 2008, 01:56 AM, said:
lol, sorry I was not trying to be obnoxious, I often don't read the polls and just read the threads so I didn't realize it was 3C or pass. Needless to say I'm not a fan of pass.
#7
Posted 2008-July-04, 01:34
There's nothing wrong with 3C on this hand. If partner thinks 3NT is making, why should we think differently?
Jxx
AQx
A
AKxxxx
OK, I agree 3NT may not be making, but also we haven't been doubled yet, and I'm not convinced that - opposite heart stuff - 4C is likely to be much better
#8
Posted 2008-July-04, 01:40
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#9
Posted 2008-July-04, 01:50
Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.
#10
Posted 2008-July-04, 02:05
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#11
Posted 2008-July-04, 03:00
#12
Posted 2008-July-04, 06:52
FrancesHinden, on Jul 4 2008, 02:34 AM, said:
There's nothing wrong with 3C on this hand. If partner thinks 3NT is making, why should we think differently?
Jxx
AQx
A
AKxxxx
OK, I agree 3NT may not be making, but also we haven't been doubled yet, and I'm not convinced that - opposite heart stuff - 4C is likely to be much better
Agree with Frances This hand is about what partner can expect as a minimum 3♣ raise, so why pull 3N? If 3N is a wrap, you may have some explaining to do
#13
Posted 2008-July-04, 07:04
#15
Posted 2008-July-04, 11:16
#16
Posted 2008-July-05, 22:57
Judging from the ensuing 'discussion', the four pass votes came from terminals attended by monkeys with high probability. By the theory of monkeys, only about (22-4 =) 18 of the 3♣ votes are legitimate in expectation.
#17
Posted 2008-July-06, 03:20