BBO Discussion Forums: Less dizzying heights. - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Less dizzying heights.

#1 User is offline   matmat 

  • ded
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,459
  • Joined: 2005-August-11
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2008-July-01, 02:27

same matchup. the air's a little thicker. You're sitting south.


Scoring: XIMP

This one not so high...

(p) - p - (2NT)* - (3%)
(X) - 3 - (p) -?

* - 2NT was minors. 55+, 7-11HCP
% - you were hoping this was some sort of call emphasizing
the majors, perhaps hearts, no discussion. p seems to have
fielded it at least a little bit.

what now?
what methods would you like to have had available?

0

#2 User is offline   fromageGB 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,681
  • Joined: 2008-April-06

Posted 2008-July-01, 03:54

In the absence of discussion I would assume double followed by a cue bid was a very strong hand, so the immediate 3 is not that. Therefore double is a takeout, 3 is a takeout with better hearts, and 3 is a takeout with better spades. Partner's 3 is a signoff, but my hand is enough for 4.

I look forward to posts telling me what better methods are.
0

#3 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,083
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2008-July-01, 03:58

4, what did partner have?

 wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the 3.


 rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#4 User is offline   655321 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,502
  • Joined: 2007-December-22

Posted 2008-July-01, 04:32

4.

I would have started with a double, but 3 has turned out well for us. With 4 now we have shown a very strong hand with both majors, better hearts. Luckily that is exactly what we have. :)
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
0

#5 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2008-July-01, 07:02

I like my bidding so far- at least it had worked and bid a confident 4 Heart, maybe missing a slam, but such is life.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#6 User is offline   ASkolnick 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 385
  • Joined: 2007-November-20

Posted 2008-July-01, 07:50

OK, I'll bite. I bid 4C, slam try.

1) If I am going to bid game, I might as well show extras which I have.
2) As for partner showing a minimum, that I think is incorrect. He was not forced to bid after the double. You can re-open with a redouble, so partner has some values (6-10) HCP for his bid. If he has KH, AS you can be OK.
0

#7 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2008-July-01, 10:58

655321, on Jul 1 2008, 08:32 PM, said:

4.

I would have started with a double, but 3 has turned out well for us. With 4 now we have shown a very strong hand with both majors, better hearts. Luckily that is exactly what we have. :)

agree
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#8 User is offline   matmat 

  • ded
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,459
  • Joined: 2005-August-11
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2008-July-02, 11:29

p had a dog, and probably overbid it at the first go:

JT
KJx
87xxx
Txx

4 was down 1 when the side suits broke (surprise!) poorly.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users