This means that registering would require the software to be changed to support this (a changed or different dialog box for registering, checking that the 3 other players are online when the registration attempt is made, sending request messages to 3 other players rather than one, and so on).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Sure

That's why I posted this thought in a thread under the heading "Suggestions for the software" (Not trying to be funny either

)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
When the team match starts, the software would also have to grab the 8 players and assign them seats.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is what already happens also for team matches
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is also another fundamental difference: Anyone can set up a team game, but you have to have special privileges set by an administrator to set up a pairs tournament. I think part of the idea was to allow team matches to be set up relatively spontaneously.
----------------------------------------
Sure.

My point is that now, let's say you are trying to setup a team match and u do not have yet 8 people but only 6.
You cannot start the double table until 8 persons are available.
It wd be nice if u can start a partially filled double table, waiting for the last 2-3 players.
And with the facility of players self registration accepted or not by the host, it is equivalkent to an invitation (the current mechanism).
Also, players would see which seat is free and who wd be their partner in the team game (something that does not always happen right now, because people simpli accept to playy without knowing who will betheir p, but then later complain of playing with a bad partner).
Allowing a team matchh host to open an empty team match and partially fill out seats wd simplify, in my opinion many things
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I imagine Fred and Uday could handle the programming changes. I don't know whether they want to (and if they are willing, what priority it would have). My thoughts, for what they are worth.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This point is important, since many people are starting to request more and more and more from BBO functionalities.
Your comment- which I agree with- gives me the opportunity to specify that mine is not a request, just a suggestion for a potential improvement.
This is why, after all, this "Suggestion for the software" thread was made for.
"Bridge is like dance: technique's important but what really matters is not to step on partner's feet !"