What's your call?
Page 1 of 1
Club game problem 1
#2
Posted 2008-May-29, 01:30
An invitational 3H seems best.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#3
Posted 2008-May-29, 01:41
4♥. I expect this is going to lead to 4♠-pass-pass; if so I'll bid again. Perhaps I shouldn't plan for an auction that involves guessing at the five level, but I can't think of anything better.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#6
Posted 2008-May-29, 04:56
5♦. This is a double fit auction and opps certainly won't let you play 4♥. Thus preempt is right and you should bid the maximum, so as to shut LHO's spades.
#7
Posted 2008-May-29, 05:05
4 Nt wich show both red with better D (cannot be slammish since ive passed on 1C.
Im a bit afraid partner got a 15+ balanced.
Im a bit afraid partner got a 15+ balanced.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#9
Posted 2008-May-29, 06:10
benlessard, on May 29 2008, 12:05 PM, said:
4 Nt wich show both red with better D (cannot be slammish since ive passed on 1C.
Im a bit afraid partner got a 15+ balanced.
Im a bit afraid partner got a 15+ balanced.
So why don't you bid 3NT? It can hardly be to make, so it must be suggesting a sacrifice if opps bid 4♠...
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#10
Posted 2008-May-29, 06:18
Why can 3NT not be to make?
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#11
Posted 2008-May-29, 06:27
3♠
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#13
Posted 2008-May-29, 09:45
3♥ is enough I think. Unless you play Sandwich NT (tre gauche), pard isn't promising great heart support here.
"Phil" on BBO
Page 1 of 1

Help

(1♣)-P-(1♠)-X,
(2♣)-?