http://techdirt.com/...134101246.shtml
Page 1 of 1
One for the forum lawyers
#1
Posted 2008-May-28, 17:47
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#2
Posted 2008-May-28, 18:17
wow... i'm not sure the law should get involved in this, except to help this guy collect from paypal (assuming he didn't break the terms of service)
"Paul Krugman is a stupid person's idea of what a smart person sounds like." Newt Gingrich (paraphrased)
#3
Posted 2008-May-28, 18:21
The use of fake names raises an eyebrow.
That said, I'm not sure how this guy should get in trouble. Corporations do this stuff all the time, in a manner of speaking. I'd like to be able, for instance, to hold every money transaction for one minute.
With a return of, say, a mere 5%, I'd want maybe $250,000 a year. That would mean that I would have to have about $5,000,000 in the bank. If $5,000,000 changed hands per minute, I'd have it. That's about $300,000,000 per hour, or $7,200,000,000 per day. I'd bet that about $7 Billion changes hands each day, when you add it all up.
That said, I'm not sure how this guy should get in trouble. Corporations do this stuff all the time, in a manner of speaking. I'd like to be able, for instance, to hold every money transaction for one minute.
With a return of, say, a mere 5%, I'd want maybe $250,000 a year. That would mean that I would have to have about $5,000,000 in the bank. If $5,000,000 changed hands per minute, I'd have it. That's about $300,000,000 per hour, or $7,200,000,000 per day. I'd bet that about $7 Billion changes hands each day, when you add it all up.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#4
Posted 2008-May-28, 18:39
kenrexford, on May 28 2008, 07:21 PM, said:
The use of fake names raises an eyebrow.
It doesn't just 'raise an eyebrow'.
If there's a "limit one per customer" for something free (and for Paypal it's actually a limit of two accounts per customer), and you use a fake name to get more stuff, you've committed theft at the very least, and in this case probably wire fraud to boot.
#5
Posted 2008-May-28, 21:20
Actually, in Ohio one could, in theory, be extremely undecided about one's common law name changes.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#6
Posted 2008-May-28, 22:31
kenrexford, on May 28 2008, 10:20 PM, said:
Actually, in Ohio one could, in theory, be extremely undecided about one's common law name changes.
Could you vote using each of those names?
#7
Posted 2008-May-29, 13:32
I am sure it comes under the heading of "theft by deception," or fraud.
Page 1 of 1