BBO Discussion Forums: What would this mean in your partnerships? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

What would this mean in your partnerships?

#1 User is offline   CSGibson 

  • Tubthumper
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,835
  • Joined: 2007-July-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR, USA
  • Interests:Bridge, pool, financial crime. New experiences, new people.

Posted 2008-May-26, 17:32

Scoring: MP

(P)-P-(1♣)-1♦,
(P)-2♥-(P)-?


This is the auction up to this point, I was curious how people played that 2♥ bid in their own partnerships.

My partner claimed it was invitational with a good 5 hearts, but without promising a fit in diamonds, and said it was expert standard. :angry: I'm looking for thoughts to either back that up or refute it, because I'd like to know what really is standard there.
Chris Gibson
0

#2 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2008-May-26, 18:22

Fit-showing.

Your partner's interpretation is played by nobody (why not just bid 1♥?). I hate it when people back up their psychotic interpretations of bids as "EXPERT STANDARD."
0

#3 User is offline   Echognome 

  • Deipnosophist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,386
  • Joined: 2005-March-22

Posted 2008-May-26, 18:29

Jump = fit.
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
0

#4 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,606
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2008-May-26, 18:31

I suspect your partner is using Humpty Dumpty's definition of "expert standard". Bridge World Standard 2001 defines a jump in a new suit as fit showing.
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

#5 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2008-May-26, 18:42

Fit bid. Obviously.

If the meaning of "expert standard" was that this bid is a good standard by which to judge an expert (if fit bid = expert, if not = not), I agree.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#6 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,516
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-May-26, 18:44

By an unpassed hand it would be natural, forcing (yeah STRONG JUMPSHIFT), but fit-showing by a passed hand and this should be universal.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#7 User is offline   inquiry 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 14,566
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amelia Island, FL
  • Interests:Bridge, what else?

Posted 2008-May-26, 18:53

5♥, 10ish points, ♦ fit
--Ben--

#8 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2008-May-26, 19:16

Agree with all previous. 1H by a passed hand is natural and forcing, 2H is fit showing.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#9 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2008-May-26, 19:26

Funny.

If I had to pick my preference...

Top Choice = Fit-Showing

2ND: Min-Splinter in support of diamonds

3RD: Like a Roman Jump (diamonds and spades 5-5, less then opening barely)

4TH: Preemptive diamond raise, lead-director

I could go on for a while without getting to "hearts."
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#10 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2008-May-26, 19:34

Fitted.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#11 User is offline   peachy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,056
  • Joined: 2007-November-19
  • Location:Pacific Time

Posted 2008-May-27, 00:51

CSGibson, on May 26 2008, 06:32 PM, said:

Scoring: MP

(P)-P-(1♣)-1♦,
(P)-2♥-(P)-?


This is the auction up to this point, I was curious how people played that 2♥ bid in their own partnerships.

My partner claimed it was invitational with a good 5 hearts, but without promising a fit in diamonds, and said it was expert standard. :) I'm looking for thoughts to either back that up or refute it, because I'd like to know what really is standard there.

"Nobody" except your partner plays it as 5 hearts, invitational, and not promising diamond support. Claiming that meaning to be "expert standard" is silly. Without agreements, I think most would interpret it as fit showing with [good] hearts on the side.
0

#12 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,088
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-May-27, 00:55

Fit jump.

If your partner holds 5 hearts with inv.
values, he can bid 1H, which would
mean exactly this.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#13 User is offline   EricK 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,303
  • Joined: 2003-February-14
  • Location:England

Posted 2008-May-27, 01:05

Is it worth my pointing out that I think this should be fit-showing?

It won't help you in determining what expert standard is.
0

#14 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2008-May-27, 01:28

Agree with fit-showing
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#15 User is offline   hotShot 

  • Axxx Axx Axx Axx
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,976
  • Joined: 2003-August-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-May-27, 02:13

In my partnership this is agreed as "misfit, single suited in ♥, weak and preemptive" (implication is that I should not bid on). I don't claim this to be standard.
0

#16 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2008-May-27, 02:44

The_Hog, on May 27 2008, 02:16 AM, said:

Agree with all previous. 1H by a passed hand is natural and

non-

Quote

forcing, 2H is fit showing.

0

#17 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2008-May-27, 03:14

hotShot, on May 27 2008, 03:13 PM, said:

In my partnership this is agreed as "misfit, single suited in ♥, weak and preemptive" (implication is that I should not bid on). I don't claim this to be standard.

Wouldn't you have opened a weak 2H with this?
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#18 User is offline   hotShot 

  • Axxx Axx Axx Axx
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,976
  • Joined: 2003-August-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-May-27, 04:46

The_Hog, on May 27 2008, 11:14 AM, said:

hotShot, on May 27 2008, 03:13 PM, said:

In my partnership this is agreed as "misfit, single suited in ♥, weak and preemptive" (implication is that I should not bid on). I don't claim this to be standard.

Wouldn't you have opened a weak 2H with this?

This is a hand to weak to open as weak 2 or a long suit that has no honors.
0

#19 User is offline   TylerE 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,760
  • Joined: 2006-January-30

Posted 2008-May-27, 05:25

hotShot, on May 27 2008, 05:46 AM, said:

This is a hand to weak to open as weak 2 or a long suit that has no honors.

I have no earthly idea why people feel the need to show that hand with anything other than PASS.
0

#20 User is offline   hotShot 

  • Axxx Axx Axx Axx
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,976
  • Joined: 2003-August-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-May-27, 06:44

TylerE, on May 27 2008, 01:25 PM, said:

hotShot, on May 27 2008, 05:46 AM, said:

This is a hand to weak to open as weak 2 or a long suit that has no honors.

I have no earthly idea why people feel the need to show that hand with anything other than PASS.

Your LHO and your partner share some 30+ HCP.
Instead of opening 2♥ with 7 HCP hoping to find some 10 in partners hand, you are bidding 2♥ with 2 HCP expecting to find 15+ HCP in partners hand.
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users