Toughie
#1
Posted 2008-May-17, 13:59
1♠-4♥-?
You hold ♠xx♥AKxxx♦KQxxxx♣void.
Red versus White at IMP's
Danny
#2
Posted 2008-May-17, 14:56
If my black suits were reversed, I'd 5♦, but this is a useful dummy if pard has 6 spades.
#4
Posted 2008-May-17, 16:57
If I pass, pard will probably double and I'll be happy. Even if he passes, there's no guarantee I'll make 4♠. Especially if leftie remembers to lead a trump.
#5
Posted 2008-May-18, 03:28
#6
Posted 2008-May-18, 08:17
Free, on May 18 2008, 04:28 AM, said:
For quick passers, you may find declarer in 4♥ with
♠xxxx ♥- ♦x ♣AQJTxxxx and he accepts down 10. That is 500 for your side. How happy are you?
Is this his hand? Probably not. Has anyone ever made a psychic preempt like this before? Yes it has happened to me twice, both times when they are white and I am red (but at matchpoints each time i have to admit).
Once it blew up in the preempters face when his partner could not take a joke, once we in fact took all the tricks undoubled, so I am averaging 50% against this type of crazyness.
If the bid is honest, partner has a black hand, which is not going to be good for us. I guess I join the passers and hope for a reopening double.
#7
Posted 2008-May-18, 08:40
ofcourse I wouldn't be happy if RHO preempted with a void. But that's a risk you have to take when not playing penalty doubles... I would congratulate my opponent for his bid.
#9
Posted 2008-May-19, 20:03
3for3, on May 17 2008, 02:59 PM, said:
1♠-4♥-?
You hold ♠xx♥AKxxx♦KQxxxx♣void.
Red versus White at IMP's
Danny
I am a passer. My x's are takeout oriented, and I can't handle partner bidding 5C (my diamonds are just not good enough to bid opposite a S-C 2 suiter)
#10
Posted 2008-May-19, 21:08
#11
Posted 2008-May-20, 00:29
#12
Posted 2008-May-20, 05:21
#13
Posted 2008-May-20, 06:59
#14
Posted 2008-May-20, 07:54
I bid 4♠. If I double, partner will probably says 5♣ and then I'll have to say 5♠. I'd rather play 4♠. If we're in a 5-2 fit, so what? We still have more trumps than they do.
#15 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-May-20, 07:57
jtfanclub, on May 20 2008, 08:54 AM, said:
Shocking!
#16
Posted 2008-May-22, 13:27
3for3, on May 17 2008, 02:59 PM, said:
1♠-4♥-?
You hold ♠xx♥AKxxx♦KQxxxx♣void.
Red versus White at IMP's
Assuming that 1♠ = 5+ cards is among our conventiional agreements,
IMO _P = 10, _X = 6, 4♠ = 5, 5♦ = 4.
#17
Posted 2008-May-22, 13:31
- hrothgar
#18
Posted 2008-May-22, 16:34
nige1, on May 22 2008, 09:27 PM, said:
3for3, on May 17 2008, 02:59 PM, said:
1♠-4♥-?
You hold ♠xx♥AKxxx♦KQxxxx♣void.
Red versus White at IMP's
Assuming that 1♠ = 5+ cards is among our conventiional agreements,
IMO _P = 10, _X = 6, 4♠ = 5, 5♦ = 4.
I agree with your assessment except all those points for the non pass calls.
George Carlin
#19
Posted 2008-May-23, 01:36
Bid 5H hoping partner can read your hand ?
What about
1S-----(4H)-----pass-----(pass)
4S-----(5C)-----???
How is partner going to be able to see that you have values ?
X is clear cut for me. At least if there is a followed up partner going to play me for values.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#20
Posted 2008-May-26, 20:05
benlessard, on May 23 2008, 02:36 AM, said:
Bid 5H hoping partner can read your hand ? What about
1S-----(4H)-----pass-----(pass)
4S-----(5C)-----???
How is partner going to be able to see that you have values ?
X is clear cut for me. At least if there is a followed up partner going to play me for values.
If partner protects with 4♠ and RHO tries his luck with 5♣, then IMO you should bid a confident
But if partner reopens with a double instead of 4♠, then you might risk a pass = 10

Help
