kenrexford, on May 23 2008, 04:55 PM, said:
So, I'll pretend East leads out of turn. I duck (scissors). I expect a card to come back that I will win, like another diamond. I then win the Ace and lead a small spade to the 10 (unless West shows out). I'll keep East in that way. On whatever return, I cash the top spade in dummy. If spades are 2-2, I lose at most three tricks this way.
See here's where you lost me. Say you duck the diamond, win the second, and play a spade to the ten losing to an honor. Now another diamond comes back and you ruff. You cash the top spade and both follow. Okay, trumps are pulled. You've lost one spade and one diamond. But how do you lose at most three tricks this way? You still have two potentially losing hearts. You need to either take the heart finesse or discard a heart on a club. But you have very few entries to the long club hand (in fact you have exactly
one entry since you have already played the diamond ace). So unless the
♣J falls under the
♣AKQ, you cannot set up clubs and then get back to the long club hand to discard your heart loser.
So on this line,
even when spades are 2-2 you still need either club jack falling or the heart finesse (as well as diamonds not 7-1). The alternative line is 100% when spades are 2-2.
If spades are 3-1, you need the third spade not to be with fewer than three clubs (otherwise when you try to cash the three top clubs they ruff and cash heart ace for one down). You also need either the club jack falling in three rounds (so you can discard your hearts) or the heart finesse. Having the long clubs in the same hand with the long spades is around 50%, and a 3-2 club break is not guaranteed either, so it seems like this line will make on substantially less than half the 3-1 spade breaks. The alternate line makes on 3-1 spades when the heart finesse wins, which is also probably less than half (given the overcall) but you must combine this with substantially better odds on 2-2 spades.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit