I'd bid 2♣ even if East passes. This is a game-force hand.
Oops I meant to say 2♣ not "Other" - getting sleepy (I was thinking 2♠ but that should show a control or a real suit depending on your methods).
Hard decision A serious one
#22
Posted 2008-May-20, 18:44
effervesce, on May 20 2008, 12:51 AM, said:
Halo, on May 19 2008, 04:15 PM, said:
Awkward hand.
I went for the crude 3NT.
Not absolutely sure where everyone else expected to end up.
I went for the crude 3NT.
Not absolutely sure where everyone else expected to end up.
3NT?? You don't have a spade stopper, if you want to be in 3NT you've just wrong-sided the contract.... 2♣ --> 3♦ for me.
in theory the suit you need to stop on this sequence is clubs, the suit partner denied. This is at least true for 1NT overcalls, 3NT might be another story, but it is reasonable.
#23
Posted 2008-May-21, 10:39
2♣ seem obvious first. I misclicked when voting - got a sick 2♦ added to the poll.
Kind regards,
Harald
Harald
#24
Posted 2008-May-21, 12:23
This problem is a reason that I was convinced by a great partner of mine to switch tactics. It seems to be quite effective to have a two-way cuebid structure (2♣ with heart focus, 2♠ with diamond focus), handling all spade-based hands through the double. Not only does this avert some damage from preemption, but it sets the tone of the auction in the right direction immediately.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.

Help
