Page 1 of 1
bid
#1
Posted 2008-May-09, 08:55
♠A84
♥AQ86
♦T9
♣K875
Both vul, MPs
1♦*-(1♥)-2♣**-(2♥)
2NT-(3♥)-3♠-(p)
??
* could be short (Precision)
** NF, (other options here: Dbl is negative, 1♠ = 5+ F1, 2♦ = NF, 2♥ = inv+ can't bid NT or ♠)
♥AQ86
♦T9
♣K875
Both vul, MPs
1♦*-(1♥)-2♣**-(2♥)
2NT-(3♥)-3♠-(p)
??
* could be short (Precision)
** NF, (other options here: Dbl is negative, 1♠ = 5+ F1, 2♦ = NF, 2♥ = inv+ can't bid NT or ♠)
#2
Posted 2008-May-09, 10:42
I would have bid 3♣ on the previous round. I suppose once I've decided to hide the club support, I'll go through and try 3N now.
#3
Posted 2008-May-09, 10:48
If 2NT shows club support then I think it is quite descriptive. I assume that we cannopt have a stronger balanced hand so there would be no reason to bid without a club fit.
I would also bid 3NT now (again assuming that we have agreed that 2NT shows club support because otherwise I don't understand 2NT).
I would also bid 3NT now (again assuming that we have agreed that 2NT shows club support because otherwise I don't understand 2NT).
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#4
Posted 2008-May-09, 10:53
Wouldn't
♠A84
♥AQ86
♦T975
♣K8
also be improved by the club call from partner?
♠A84
♥AQ86
♦T975
♣K8
also be improved by the club call from partner?
#5
Posted 2008-May-09, 11:10
There are no explicit agreements about 2NT here, but han is correct in that we cannot hold a stronger balanced hand.
#6
Posted 2008-May-09, 12:01
I don't think 3♠ is a probe for 3N but its possible. With a moderate 5-6, wouldn't you bid it this way too? You wouldn't worry about the auction dying at 2♣.
I have a great heart stop but I'm scared to death of the diamond suit in 3N. I'm bidding 4♠ just as a safety mechanism but would expect to end up in 5♣ most of the time.
I have a great heart stop but I'm scared to death of the diamond suit in 3N. I'm bidding 4♠ just as a safety mechanism but would expect to end up in 5♣ most of the time.
"Phil" on BBO
#7
Posted 2008-May-09, 12:09
I think you might as well have bid 3NT last round given how little it needs to make.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#9
Posted 2008-May-09, 13:18
No way, 4♠ now.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
#10
Posted 2008-May-09, 14:32
Can't we have 4 spades for our 2NT bid and wouldn't partner always bid 3S with 4-1-2-6 distribution? Oh wait, 4-1-2-6 also doesn't do too well in 3NT, undo undo.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#11
Posted 2008-May-09, 14:36
I'd like to know what partner does with an invitational 4-6. If he'd normally double 1♥ with that, 4♠ seems needlessly to risk playing in a 3-3 fit - partner might pass with something like KQx x xxx AJxxxx, expecting us to have four-card spade support - so I'd bid 5♣. 3NT deserves to lose the first five diamond tricks.
If partner can have four spades, 4♠ seems fair enough at matchpoints.
If partner can have four spades, 4♠ seems fair enough at matchpoints.
This post has been edited by gnasher: 2008-May-09, 14:37
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#12
Posted 2008-May-12, 09:25
Partner had J9xxx --- Ax A10xxxx.
Not knowing how many spades partner was showing, and fairly confident my LHO would make the wrong lead, I bid 3NT (and got a heart lead). Clubs were 3-0. Surprisingly, there was virtually no MP difference between 3NT+3 and 4♠+4.
Not knowing how many spades partner was showing, and fairly confident my LHO would make the wrong lead, I bid 3NT (and got a heart lead). Clubs were 3-0. Surprisingly, there was virtually no MP difference between 3NT+3 and 4♠+4.
Page 1 of 1

Help
