Posted 2008-May-07, 10:57
Double would probably have just been cards (i.e. set up a forcing auction, penalize if you can). Then 4♥ over 3♠ might show this, but it also has a bit of a 5-6 sound to it. We really hadn't discussed this particular sequence (where we have agreed a suit, opponents bid a suit naturally, and our best contract is in the suit they bid).
Anyway, the interesting problem is one that Phil alluded to in his post. Say hearts are ♥Axx on declarer's right. You still need RHO to take the heart ace on the first round of the suit. Otherwise the play goes something like what happened to me at the table:
Spade ace. Heart to king, winning. Spade ruff. But at this point, if I play a heart RHO hops ace and gives partner a ruff, then a diamond return sees me losing a heart, a heart ruff, and a spade in the end position.
I think a slightly better line might be to win the spade ace and ruff a club, then ruff a spade and play a heart up. This is not really any different from the original line everyone has suggested on a double-dummy basis, but seeing that there are no club tricks and that I can crossruff the hand may cause RHO to panic, hop ace, and push a trump through (afraid my hand is something like xxxx Kxx AKQxxx - and the heart king is trick eleven if I'm allowed to take it now and continue the cross ruff; admittedly I might try to ruff all the spades in this case before playing a heart up, but this also is not without risk of a trump promotion and RHO also may not think it through). I suspect that psychologically, this may be a better line than the one proposed.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit