BBO Discussion Forums: Do you or don't you? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Do you or don't you? and why or why not?

#1 User is offline   louisg 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 114
  • Joined: 2008-March-05

Posted 2008-April-30, 16:58

Scoring: IMP


12 board team match, all experts

Auction:

1C Dbl 2C 4H
5C 5H Pass ?
0

#2 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2008-April-30, 17:10

I pass, partner could just be taking a shot with like a club void and 4 hearts and a 9 count or w/e. We have shown our hand let's not break discipline now.
0

#3 User is offline   655321 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,502
  • Joined: 2007-December-22

Posted 2008-April-30, 17:10

6

Opposite AKxx Axxx xxxx x we have 11 tricks, and this is not a 5 bid.
Partner has a club void and a good hand, or (less likely) a singleton club and a very good hand.

So, 6 (7 might be cold, but even if it is, we can't find it) because 5 is a serious bid, it doesn't show a normal takeout double that hoped to make 4.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
0

#4 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-April-30, 17:16

Very easy pass. Even if 6 could possibly make it's a total shot in the dark and very undisciplined. How much less than this are we supposed to have been able to bid 4 with?
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#5 User is offline   louisg 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 114
  • Joined: 2008-March-05

Posted 2008-April-30, 21:09

Quote

Very easy pass. Even if 6♥ could possibly make it's a total shot in the dark and very undisciplined. How much less than this are we supposed to have been able to bid 4♥ with?


How about xxx KTxxxx x Axx? Given that we are now pretty sure that partner has a club void (they figure to be 6-4 on everyone's bidding), isn't this hand a full trick worse than the actual one?

Quote

I pass, partner could just be taking a shot with like a club void and 4 hearts and a 9 count or w/e. We have shown our hand let's not break discipline now.


Wouldn't "taking a shot with like a club void and 4 hearts and a 9 count" be breaking discipline? This isn't a forcing pass situation, so partner should be passing with a minimum double, shouldn't he?

Believe me, I'm not claiming that it's clear to bid on here (that's why I posted), but these arguments haven't convinced me.
0

#6 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2008-April-30, 21:22

louisg, on Apr 30 2008, 10:09 PM, said:

Quote

Very easy pass. Even if 6♥ could possibly make it's a total shot in the dark and very undisciplined. How much less than this are we supposed to have been able to bid 4♥ with?


How about xxx KTxxxx x Axx? Given that we are now pretty sure that partner has a club void (they figure to be 6-4 on everyone's bidding), isn't this hand a full trick worse than the actual one?

Quote

I pass, partner could just be taking a shot with like a club void and 4 hearts and a 9 count or w/e. We have shown our hand let's not break discipline now.


Wouldn't "taking a shot with like a club void and 4 hearts and a 9 count" be breaking discipline? This isn't a forcing pass situation, so partner should be passing with a minimum double, shouldn't he?

Believe me, I'm not claiming that it's clear to bid on here (that's why I posted), but these arguments haven't convinced me.

Partner has limited their hand. If you have a minimum hand with a club void and 4 hearts why would you consider it undisciplined to bid? You're not trying for slam and partner should never be bidding again, so you're not going to mislead them. You're simply trying to take a good save or make 5H.

edit: Or are you implying that 5H is some kind of slam invite/shows extras or something? I don't get it.
0

#7 User is offline   louisg 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 114
  • Joined: 2008-March-05

Posted 2008-April-30, 21:32

Quote

Or are you implying that 5H is some kind of slam invite/shows extras or something? I don't get it.


Yes, I'm definitely implying that 5H shows extras. In fact, I'm not just implying it :)

Quote

This isn't a forcing pass situation, so partner should be passing with a minimum double, shouldn't he?

0

#8 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2008-April-30, 21:40

louisg, on Apr 30 2008, 10:32 PM, said:

Quote

Or are you implying that 5H is some kind of slam invite/shows extras or something? I don't get it.


Yes, I'm definitely implying that 5H shows extras. In fact, I'm not just implying it :)

Quote

This isn't a forcing pass situation, so partner should be passing with a minimum double, shouldn't he?

Ok, I don't agree with this. I don't see how competing to the 5 level opposite a limited partner can show extras when it is not a slam try. Obviously if you think this bid is a slam try then you should bid slam, but being able to just compete to the 5 level seems like a far more important thing to be able to do. To me this is like thinking the auction 2H 4S 5H shows extras since you can pass with a minimum, that obviously isn't always true.
0

#9 User is offline   benlessard 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,465
  • Joined: 2006-January-07
  • Location:Montreal Canada
  • Interests:All games. i really mean all of them.

Posted 2008-April-30, 23:33

Bidding 5H dont suggest slam at all. It suggest that 5H might make or be a cheap save. I think the correct bid is pass but bidding 6H is probably a fair gamble.

Decent opponents will often smell the void and lead spades so we might easily lose 2-3 spades right from the start

We are playing the hand so partner K isnt protected
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
0

#10 User is offline   MFA 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,625
  • Joined: 2006-October-04
  • Location:Denmark

Posted 2008-May-01, 06:12

With a club void and 4 decent hearts, partner will take the push even with a dead minimum as a two-way shot. Although our hand looks promising and slam easily could be on, I think that there are too many holes to bid an undisciplined 6.
Michael Askgaard
0

#11 User is offline   kfay 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,208
  • Joined: 2007-July-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Michigan
  • Interests:Science, Sports

Posted 2008-May-01, 06:49

me don't
Kevin Fay
0

#12 User is offline   ewj 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 303
  • Joined: 2005-April-12

Posted 2008-May-01, 06:53

Easy pass
0

#13 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,397
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2008-May-01, 06:58

The only call that exists in this position is pass IMHO. If 5 was a slam invite, then how is p supposed to express a desire to compete to the 5-level?
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#14 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2008-May-01, 08:03

helene_t, on May 1 2008, 01:58 PM, said:

The only call that exists in this position is pass IMHO.

Aren't you allowed to reevaluate your hand in the light of further bidding? I'm not saying that you should necessarily do so here (although it's quite tempting), but I don't like the principle that having limited my hand I'm not then allowed to change my mind about its value.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#15 User is offline   TimG 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,972
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine, USA

Posted 2008-May-01, 08:09

gnasher, on May 1 2008, 09:03 AM, said:

helene_t, on May 1 2008, 01:58 PM, said:

The only call that exists in this position is pass IMHO.

Aren't you allowed to reevaluate your hand in the light of further bidding? I'm not saying that you should necessarily do so here (although it's quite tempting), but I don't like the principle that having limited my hand I'm not then allowed to change my mind about its value.

But, this is sort of a case of 1N-4H (transfer)-think. Responder had ways of showing a hand that had a whiff of slam interest -- it's not for opener to re-evaluate here.

Now, I admit that the auction in question is not an identical situation, but it is similar. While "never" may not be right, it seems that bidding on should be a very rare choice. "Only call" may have been an overbid, but not by much.
0

#16 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2008-May-01, 09:09

I don't think the comparison with 1N-4 particularly apt. In the given situation, you need a perfect minimum (KQJx AJxx xxxxx -) to make slam cold, and partner had very little space to express gradations of interest. That would not be the case after a 1NT opening and an attempted signoff in game, because responder started with plenty of space and various options, but declined to use any of them.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#17 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2008-May-01, 09:16

Do you or don't you do what? :) Pass! wtp
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#18 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2008-May-01, 10:11

Pass ! PD is most likely bidding 5 as a two way shot. Maybe it makes, maybe it is a good save if 5 makes.

I basically bid my offensive values the first time. Noting that my playing strength for 4 is based on length and some HCP rather than decent (11-12 HCP) and less length, shouldn't make me think we have a magic slam and also makes me think that PD's 5 is more likely to be a two way shot.

Perhaps the opps are doubling 5...if we bid 6 and they had any thoughts about doubling 5, we will get whacked. Then...I expect to lose a couple of things..

1) More IMPs (perhaps loads more if we take 11 tricks in 6x)

2) PD's confidence and perhaps PD

3) Two teammates.

Clear pass to me .. neilkaz ..
0

#19 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-May-01, 10:25

Here we go again, instead of thinking about which call has the best expected value we worry about what partner and teammates will do if we choose wrongly. If you really need to worry about that then perhaps it is time you find new people to play with.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#20 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2008-May-01, 11:58

This is very simple. We have our bid. Partner did not invite us to bid more. Therefore there's no reason to bid further.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users