BBO Discussion Forums: Intermediate pre-emp after 3/4seat - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Intermediate pre-emp after 3/4seat parter passed hand

#1 User is offline   firmit 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 263
  • Joined: 2007-January-26

Posted 2008-April-27, 05:25

Partner is dealer and passes. RHO opens 1minor. What is maximum for 2M now?

All red /MP
:CHO - RHO - YOU - LHO
pass - 1[cl] - 2[sp]!- ?


I choose a somewhat intermediate-strong route, bidding 2♠ with KQ10xxx AKx xx xx. I did not expect us having game in this position, but of course, 4♠ makes opposite Axxx xx Qxx Kxxx with ♣A infront. The questions that came up:

1) how should 2♠ vs 3♠ be defined
2) what should the direct action in the next seat be (LHO-seat after the pre-empt)? Is 2nt good-bad here? Or direct bid to play?

I know Grĝtheim-Tundal used to play intermediate-pre-emptive bids in this position in their Viking Club, defined as something like 11-15hp 6c suit.
"Never increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything." William of Ockham (1285-1349)
0

#2 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2008-April-27, 06:06

That's a Bomb Threat Weak Jump.

Years ago, in a Mixed Pairs event, I was set up with a partner I had not met. When I made a similar "heavy" weak two, it caused some sort of good result. The opponents called for the TD, who made no adjustment. However, my partner wastold that she would have to alert my weak jump overcalls henceforth. Interpreting the situation as somehow being accused of cheating (not sure how), my partner grew more and more hostile and upset and uncontrollable. When she made a bomb threat against the other pair, several rounds later, I asked the TD (privately) to kick us out of the event. Hence, the "Bomb Threat WJO" was born.

I've made calls before that caused a bit of a stir, but this was the first time (not the last?) that my call was the proximate cause of a bomb threat being made.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#3 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2008-April-27, 09:12

I guess you meant 2♥ here or switched the major suits, since I don't believe you made a WJO on AKx.......

I'm used to a style where we play very wide ranging WJOs after partner passed; that is, we might include hands normally too strong for a WJO. I've never mentioned that on our system cards, but we always explain when asked that the bid is ostensibly weak, but might be quite a bit stronger vs a passed partner.

On the actual hand it's a toss-up between a 1-level and a 2-level overcall for me. I'd not venture the 3-level with this hand.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#4 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2008-April-27, 11:52

kenrexford, on Apr 27 2008, 04:06 AM, said:

That's a Bomb Threat Weak Jump.

Years ago, in a Mixed Pairs event, I was set up with a partner I had not met. When I made a similar "heavy" weak two, it caused some sort of good result. The opponents called for the TD, who made no adjustment. However, my partner wastold that she would have to alert my weak jump overcalls henceforth. Interpreting the situation as somehow being accused of cheating (not sure how), my partner grew more and more hostile and upset and uncontrollable. When she made a bomb threat against the other pair, several rounds later, I asked the TD (privately) to kick us out of the event. Hence, the "Bomb Threat WJO" was born.

I've made calls before that caused a bit of a stir, but this was the first time (not the last?) that my call was the proximate cause of a bomb threat being made.

Ohio LOL.

I knew a guy in Montana that pulled a knife on his pard during a club game. Seriously.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#5 User is offline   firmit 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 263
  • Joined: 2007-January-26

Posted 2008-April-27, 12:12

skaeran, on Apr 27 2008, 05:12 PM, said:

I guess you meant 2♥ here or switched the major suits, since I don't believe you made a WJO on AKx.......

Corrected
"Never increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything." William of Ockham (1285-1349)
0

#6 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2008-April-27, 13:58

pclayton, on Apr 27 2008, 12:52 PM, said:

kenrexford, on Apr 27 2008, 04:06 AM, said:

That's a Bomb Threat Weak Jump.

Years ago, in a Mixed Pairs event, I was set up with a partner I had not met.  When I made a similar "heavy" weak two, it caused some sort of good result.  The opponents called for the TD, who made no adjustment.  However, my partner wastold that she would have to alert my weak jump overcalls henceforth.  Interpreting the situation as somehow being accused of cheating (not sure how), my partner grew more and more hostile and upset and uncontrollable.  When she made a bomb threat against the other pair, several rounds later, I asked the TD (privately) to kick us out of the event.  Hence, the "Bomb Threat WJO" was born.

I've made calls before that caused a bit of a stir, but this was the first time (not the last?) that my call was the proximate cause of a bomb threat being made.

Ohio LOL.

I knew a guy in Montana that pulled a knife on his pard during a club game. Seriously.

Actually, this happened in Pennsylvania. My partner was bitter.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#7 User is online   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,178
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-April-28, 03:21

Hi,

I think your hand is too strong for a preempt, so at IMPs I would
not make the 2S bid, but at MP the bid is fine, although I most
likely still would only bid 1S anyway, I usually bid the same playing
IMP and MP.

From a LTC perspective, you have 6 looser, partner being a passed
hand, could still have 8 looser.
So for a weak jump overcall oppositte a passed hand, I would say,
that a hand with 7 looser could still make a weak jump.

The above is just a suggestion, how to develop a guideline, with
which hands you just overcall or make a weak jump.
Of course it also matters, in which field you are plaiyng, who are your
current oppoenents, how good are your methods afrer an (weak jump)
overcall and so on.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#8 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2008-April-28, 06:25

Hmmm...I asked about this once before, and it was generally agreed that it doesn't have to be alerted. Me, I want my partners to be required to alert all of my pre-empts as "might be pre-emptive...or might not.". Sounds like great fun for the opponents- what exactly are they going to do with the information?

The big one for me is minors, since it's a pain in the keister to make 11 tricks across a passed hand.

The one time I got called for this, I pointed out that they'd opened 1♣ and I'd overcalled 3♦. Sure, our jump overcalls were weak, but we didn't have an agreement about our double jumps.
0

#9 User is online   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,178
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-April-28, 07:23

jtfanclub, on Apr 28 2008, 07:25 AM, said:

Hmmm...I asked about this once before, and it was generally agreed that it doesn't have to be alerted.  Me, I want my partners to be required to alert all of my pre-empts as "might be pre-emptive...or might not.".  Sounds like great fun for the opponents- what exactly are they going to do with the information?
<snip>

We alert it: The nature of the bid is preemptive, but
facing a passed partner, the bid will have a high
variance (+/-), i.e. sometimes the bid may be based
on an opening hand.

The main information is, that you will take it as
preemptive.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#10 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2008-April-28, 07:25

If it's a wide-ranging jump overcall, when asked just say something like "Natural, random jump overcall. Usually 0-15 hcp."
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users