This Might be Unanimous
#2
Posted 2008-April-27, 01:29
thread
title
ever
i like playing it as 4♠+, forcing, but i don't think there is a standard.
[edited for color, cut and clarity..]
#3
Posted 2008-April-27, 01:59
#4
Posted 2008-April-27, 09:03
That's because I'm applying a style where we never double with 4-5 in the majors unless we're VERY STRONG. So you have to be able to bid 1♠ on xxxx (at worst) to find the 4-4 fit.
I voted 4+ F, but I know this is far from standard. I suspect there's no standard here, but I guess it's 5+ for the majority.
Harald
#5
Posted 2008-April-27, 11:20
Bridge World Standard
Poll Results for BWS 2001
These poll questions were used to determine adjustments from previous verisons of Bridge World Standard (BWS) to the 2001 version of the system. The votes are given in parentheses; the first number is the percentage of votes for the item from the expert panel. the second from readers. The Bridge World Standard Defense (BWSD) poll (in the final section), the filtrate of a preliminary poll on all aspects of defensive card play agreements—anything not shown here was accepted from the earlier version of BWSD, the expert vote on each item is given.
(a lot of stuff deleted)
After a Simple Overcall
In BWS-2001, after a simple overcall, unpassed advancer’s new-suit bids should be treated as . . .
1226a. natural and forcing. (24,27)
1226b. natural and nonforcing. (37,34)
1226c. natural and forcing at the same level as the overcall, nonforcing at a higher level. (2,3)
1226d. natural and forcing only following a two-level overcall. (23,16)
1226e. natural and forcing following a two-level overcall or as a one-level advance of a one-level overcall. (0,3)
1226f. part of a system of transfer advances. (13,17)
1226g. something not listed here. (1,0)
Oddly enough, I don't see a difference between a 4-card suit and a 5-card suit. I thought it was CLEARLY a 5-card suit but also clearly I am in the minority.
#6
Posted 2008-April-27, 11:25
if 1S could be based on a 4 carder, the
bid should certainly be forcing.
Personnally I prefer 1S to show 5 cards,
a suit as good as the overcalled one,
constructive, but non forcing.
And surely, tis wont be unanimous.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#7
Posted 2008-April-27, 11:45
paulhar, on Apr 27 2008, 09:20 AM, said:
Bridge World Standard
Poll Results for BWS 2001
These poll questions were used to determine adjustments from previous verisons of Bridge World Standard (BWS) to the 2001 version of the system. The votes are given in parentheses; the first number is the percentage of votes for the item from the expert panel. the second from readers. The Bridge World Standard Defense (BWSD) poll (in the final section), the filtrate of a preliminary poll on all aspects of defensive card play agreements—anything not shown here was accepted from the earlier version of BWSD, the expert vote on each item is given.
(a lot of stuff deleted)
After a Simple Overcall
In BWS-2001, after a simple overcall, unpassed advancer’s new-suit bids should be treated as . . .
1226a. natural and forcing. (24,27)
1226b. natural and nonforcing. (37,34)
1226c. natural and forcing at the same level as the overcall, nonforcing at a higher level. (2,3)
1226d. natural and forcing only following a two-level overcall. (23,16)
1226e. natural and forcing following a two-level overcall or as a one-level advance of a one-level overcall. (0,3)
1226f. part of a system of transfer advances. (13,17)
1226g. something not listed here. (1,0)
Oddly enough, I don't see a difference between a 4-card suit and a 5-card suit. I thought it was CLEARLY a 5-card suit but also clearly I am in the minority.
This poll was probably taken in 1999 or 2000. It's relative old in other words.
I don't understand the logic of "c", I think they have it backward in some cases.
#8
Posted 2008-April-27, 11:58
pclayton, on Apr 27 2008, 12:45 PM, said:
Really? The game has changed that much? Well, I have played maybe a local tournament a year and maybe 200-500 hands on BBO since that time so if the game is that much different, I have to relearn it and might as well give up the game since time contraints exist. And I thought the reason to give up the game was those rediculous alert/UI discussions I've seen! (i.e. you aren't allowed to know what the opponents are playing because you give unauthorized information if you ask)
#9
Posted 2008-April-27, 12:04
Whether it shows four or five is more questionable -- I suspect that most would "like" it to show five but would also bid it with a strong 42(43) hand. In any case overcaller is expected to normally raise with three card support.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#10
Posted 2008-April-27, 12:14
paulhar, on Apr 27 2008, 12:58 PM, said:
There is nothing illegal about "giving UI". The issue is that partner must go out of his way to avoid taking advantage of such UI when it does happen. You might be able to make a bid or play that gives the same information in an authorized manner, and that will override the UI.
#11
Posted 2008-April-27, 12:39
awm, on Apr 27 2008, 07:04 PM, said:
Whether it shows four or five is more questionable -- I suspect that most would "like" it to show five but would also bid it with a strong 42(43) hand. In any case overcaller is expected to normally raise with three card support.
That is what came out of the Biuedermeijer poll also. It happens to be my preferred style as well.
#12
Posted 2008-April-27, 13:00
- hrothgar

Help
