Posted 2008-April-21, 11:35
Re EHAA 2C - it's not the responses that are weird (except for 2NT - both majors, would refuse a NT invitation, and 3C - both majors, would accept a NT invitation, both of which are clearly Alertable), there isn't a call over 3C, so yeah.
It's that 2C is the correct call with AKTxxx Qx Kxx xx (will bid spades invitationally next), AKTxxx AQ AKx xx (will bid spades GF+ next), KQx Txx AKxxx T9x (NT invite, of course), and AKQJxxx x Kx KQJ (4C next for slam if 2 aces); along with any hand that actually has interest in partner's response in the major (and INV+ values). And it specifically denies 4=4=4=1 without 10 high. Yeah, we could (and do) Alert all those weird responses that may deny a 4-card major (or promise more than a 4-card major), but it's odd enough that the opponents may want to know.
Our explanation is something like "Ostensibly Stayman, but frequently has no interest in my response. Any hand INV+ that can't place the contract immediately starts with 2C". Yes, I know it's not technically Alertable; I have yet to have anyone complain (as I say, nor have I had anyone complain when we Alert 2D/2H/2S, even though (after the Pre-Alert), we don't have to do that either. I have definitely had pairs who would have complained had we not Alerted it, again, even though we didn't have to).
Long live the Republic-k. -- Major General J. Golding Frederick (tSCoSI)