BBO Discussion Forums: 3rd seat 2D multi as majors or spades - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

3rd seat 2D multi as majors or spades

#1 User is offline   firmit 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 263
  • Joined: 2007-January-26

Posted 2008-April-18, 09:18

Normally, I use Multi+Muiderberg.
A friend suggested this preemptive bid in 3rd seat:
2♦ as both majors or preemptive in spades - or strong nt of course.

One of his arguments, was that with a w2 hearts, opps would normally find their potential spadefit anyways. Never tried it, but there have been times were a major oriented preemptive bid would be nice to have ... Any thoughts or comments?
"Never increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything." William of Ockham (1285-1349)
0

#2 User is offline   rbforster 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,611
  • Joined: 2006-March-18

Posted 2008-April-18, 21:52

I'm not sure I understand - you'll still be using Muiderberg, but you're considering switching to this different 2♦ bid instead of Multi? I suppose it depends on what you're trying to do, but hands with 5/4+ majors are certainly more frequent than a weak-two style 6 card heart suit. In addition, sometimes you can preempt 3♥ with those hands (or bid 1♥ light in 3rd), so maybe having a "both majors" bid would cover more ground so to speak.

I'm less clear on whether this 2♦ or regular Multi would be more effective as a preempt (as opposed to merely more common)....

- your opponents have the benefit of 2♦ being almost forcing (especially if you include the strong NT), but that will be true of both.

- people will be more prepared for Multi than this "♠ or majors version", and hence more likely to have a decent defense

- you're likely to win the bidding at the two level regardless of which version you have, since if they have hearts and 2♦ has the spade hand you'll know to compete (or they might regret declaring 2♥).

- it will be more risky for the opps to bid a natural 2♥ over this 2♦ than multi since opener might only have a 4 card heart suit when he holds both majors and so the chance of walking into bad breaks is higher (although the breaks are less severe than when you bid 2♥ and it was the multi opener's suit).

Anyway, those are a few thoughts.

Edit: any reason your only thinking about using this in 3rd seat? Seems like it would be fine in 1st/2nd too, although you'd need to work out the constructive followups (2NT asking and responses, etc).
0

#3 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2008-April-19, 01:26

I'd advise you to keep playing multi, but using 2♥ as a hand with both Majors (because indeed a ♥ preempt won't work that often). That's a lot harder to defend against.

Compare them:
2♦ multi vs both Majors or ♠:
Opps don't have a cuebid after the multi, while they have one after the 2-way bid with ♠. There's still some ambiguity however, so it's not plain easy.
2♥ both Majors vs Muiderberg:
It's relatively easy after a Muiderberg to find a good spot (and opps usually know 9 cards after 3 tricks), while after an opening with both Majors (and they only have 1 cuebid at 2-level) it's a lot harder! Usually they'll try to find 3NT, but it's pretty hard when only 1 low level cuebid is available.
2♠ Muiderberg:
The same :P
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users