They Preempt
#1
Posted 2008-April-15, 00:33
♠Ax ♥K9xxx ♦AT9x ♣Ax
1♥ - (2♠) - P - (P)
?
#2
Posted 2008-April-15, 00:37
Bridge should be fun!
#3
Posted 2008-April-15, 00:43
As per passing 3♣ or not, would depend somewhat on methods. But assuming no further agreements, I pass.
#4
Posted 2008-April-15, 00:54
#5
Posted 2008-April-15, 00:54
If we did not agree on anysohl here, I would pass 3 Club, accepting some ridicolous contracts from time to time.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#7
Posted 2008-April-15, 02:46
I think it is relatively unlikely that the opponents will push to 3♠ so our main way to win is to find a diamond fit. Other chances are a playable club fit or a spade penalty.
One opponent has made a weak jump and most do not freely bid again after that and the other opponent has already not raised to 3♠ which most would do fairly freely with a wide range of hand at this vulnerability.
Bidding (or doubling) may work out badly at these colours even if we have a fit and given there is no guarantee of that I can't see how bidding is right. I reckon we will give up too many 200s even when we are not doubled to make it not worthwhile.
Pass!!!
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#8
Posted 2008-April-15, 03:06
#9
Posted 2008-April-15, 03:14
gnasher, on Apr 15 2008, 09:06 AM, said:
Point is, opener can have a fairly good hand and responder sometimes will have to pass with 7-8 hcp. 2NT as lebensohl will tell responder's really weak passes from moderate ones, so it seems more useful than 2NT as scrambling.
#10
Posted 2008-April-15, 03:16
whereagles, on Apr 15 2008, 10:14 AM, said:
gnasher, on Apr 15 2008, 09:06 AM, said:
Point is, opener can have a fairly good hand and responder sometimes will have to pass with 7-8 hcp. 2NT as lebensohl will tell responder's really weak passes from moderate ones, so it seems more useful than 2NT as scrambling.
Yes, I understand the benefits of Lebensohl. But on this hand I don't want to be playing it.
#12
Posted 2008-April-15, 05:29
I think with scambling avaiable, this hand is never a problem, or is it?
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#13
Posted 2008-April-15, 07:55
Codo, on Apr 15 2008, 12:29 PM, said:
I would say the opposite. Without scrambling it's a wtp pass. With scrambling I would have to think about it
#14
Posted 2008-April-15, 08:18
- hrothgar

Help
