BBO Discussion Forums: Open This With? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Open This With?

Poll: Open With (35 member(s) have cast votes)

Open With

  1. 1S (28 votes [80.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 80.00%

  2. 4S (7 votes [20.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2008-March-28, 00:54

You are playing a 24-board KO against a pretty good team.

IMPs, All Red, First Seat

♠KQJ9xxx ♥KJxxx ♦void ♣x

Your call.
0

#2 User is offline   Edmunte1 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 593
  • Joined: 2003-October-26
  • Location:Galati, Romania

Posted 2008-March-28, 01:39

1♠ seems obvious, hand is too strong for 4♠ and hearts still can be our best strain, but sometimes 4♠ may work, shutting off the opponents or puting them to a guess.
0

#3 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2008-March-28, 01:41

I voted 1♠ but I wanted to vote for 4♠.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#4 User is offline   effervesce 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 885
  • Joined: 2007-March-28

Posted 2008-March-28, 02:04

1♠ for me.
Ming

--Always remember you're unique. Just like everyone else.
0

#5 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,401
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2008-March-28, 02:49

Somewhat style dependent, this hand might be too strong for 4♠. I voted 4♠ though. With these chunky spades I'm not so concerned about the strain.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#6 User is offline   Cascade 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 6,772
  • Joined: 2003-July-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Zealand
  • Interests:Juggling, Unicycling

Posted 2008-March-28, 04:04

1♠ don't like 4♠ . I have lots of heart losers.
Wayne Burrows

I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon

#7 User is offline   Gerben42 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,577
  • Joined: 2005-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Erlangen, Germany
  • Interests:Astronomy, Mathematics
    Nuclear power

Posted 2008-March-28, 04:06

Ditto. 1♠.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do!
My Bridge Systems Page

BC Kultcamp Rieneck
0

#8 User is online   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,095
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-March-28, 05:39

1S, start bidding your suits.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#9 User is offline   Trinidad 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,531
  • Joined: 2005-October-09
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2008-March-28, 08:28

rogerclee, on Mar 28 2008, 01:54 AM, said:

You are playing a 24-board KO against a pretty good team.

IMPs, All Red, First Seat

♠KQJ9xxx ♥KJxxx ♦void ♣x

Your call.

How good is "pretty good"?

If "pretty good" means "they are good, but we are even better", I would open 1♠, which I consider the technically better bid. I will try to play the percentages and expect some IMPs coming in here and there.

If, on the other hand the opponents are better, I expect to loose some IMPs here and there. It may be great to loose a 24 board match against Nickel with a score of 8-11, which may be the best you can hope for if you play your absolute best bridge.

But this is a board where you can create a large swing in IMPs by going only slightly against the odds. Okay, 2 times out of 5, you will loose the board if you open 4♠: you will loose the match which you were destined to do anyway. 2 times out of 5, nothing special will happen: you will also loose the match, it's destiny. But 1 time out of 5, you might just win 12 IMPs. If there is another board like this, you are given a 0.2x 0.2 =0.04 (4%) chance to actually beat these guys and defy destiny (unless they can overcome a 24 IMP margin on the other 22 "boring" boards).

Let me think: Go for a 0% chance to win and a 50% chance to keep the margin small (and a 50% chance to loose big) or go for a 4% chance to win, a 16% chance to keep the margin small and an 80 % chance to loose big. I would grab the 4% chance that I am given to actually beat these guys. And I would do it again at the next opportunity.. and the next.. and the next, untill I once succeed. (After that I will be so arrogant that I will play technical bridge, since "I rate to beat them anyway". :) )

Rik
I want my opponents to leave my table with a smile on their face and without matchpoints on their score card - in that order.
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
0

#10 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-March-28, 08:35

I would open 1♠ but would not be surprised to lose a large swing against the 4♠ opening at the other table.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#11 User is offline   Apollo81 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2006-July-10
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maryland

Posted 2008-March-28, 09:03

I really don't like suppressing a 5-card major. 1♠ for me.
0

#12 User is offline   inquiry 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 14,566
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amelia Island, FL
  • Interests:Bridge, what else?

Posted 2008-March-28, 09:05

1♠ happily. An interesting alternative not listed is pass, the bidding will not die, then come in with a two suited call... not that I would do that, but i think it is a way to get to 4M with both suits in play. OF course, with these spades, you can afford to play in spades even with a 5-3 heart fit (in fact, might play a lot better in spades)
--Ben--

#13 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2008-March-28, 09:07

1♠. There will be more opportunities in this auction for swing decisions.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#14 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-March-28, 09:09

Agree with 1♠.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#15 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2008-March-28, 10:15

1S. Really don't understand why I would want to supress my 5 hearts with 4S.
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#16 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-March-28, 14:17

andy_h, on Mar 28 2008, 11:15 AM, said:

Really don't understand why I would want to supress my 5 hearts with 4S.

Cobras usually play best in the 7-card suit.

EDIT: forgot to add smillie, this was a joke.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#17 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2008-March-29, 00:15

I open this 1♠. 4♠ is more attractive in 3rd seat.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#18 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2008-March-29, 00:26

It has always been my style to open these hands 4♠, regardless of the forum majority, but maybe I should reconsider. Maybe I've seen a weird sample, but I have never seen one of these hands in real life or in a big tournament where we are somehow able to bid 6M by starting low.

This hand is no exception, but isn't really a strong case. I opened this 4♠ in first and it got swished out for +650.

At the other table, the player in my seat (actually a pretty good player) opened 1♠ and it got competitive quickly. He failed to pull a double of 5♦, which made, but 6♦ is a good sacrifice which is impossible to find after opening 4♠.
0

#19 Guest_Jlall_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 2008-March-29, 01:17

Late to the party but I would open 4S all day. Just a big believer in preempting with this type of hand, and I am not really worried about missing hearts when my spades are so good. With KJxxxxx KQJxx I would open 1S to get hearts into play.
0

#20 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2008-March-29, 19:25

rogerclee, on Mar 28 2008, 01:54 AM, said:

You are playing a 24-board KO against a pretty good team.
IMPs, All Red, First Seat ♠KQJ9xxx ♥KJxxx ♦void ♣x
Your call.

IMO 4♠ = 10, 1♠ = 7. _P = 4.
However you treat this hand, you hope to end up in 4♠, so you might as well save time and give problems to opponents rather than to partner. It is easier for opponents to cope with stereotypical pre-empts. Terence Reese railed against "The pre-empt that is known to be weak".
Guthrie.tech
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users