Any call?
#2 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-March-25, 06:27
#3
Posted 2008-March-25, 06:48
Jlall, on Mar 25 2008, 08:27 PM, said:
I got it. Partner must have good reasons if he decides to pass my double.
#4
Posted 2008-March-25, 06:49
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#5
Posted 2008-March-25, 06:56
(1♥)-pass-(2♥)-pass
(pass)-2♠
shows a classical t/o of hearts while dbl would be more minor oriented. Since a natural 2♠ is "impossible" be a hand that couldn't overcall immediately.
By the same token, 4♠ should show this hand. But ok, that doesn't give p the option of defending 4♥ so I suppose I have to double with this hand.
#6
Posted 2008-March-25, 07:14
helene_t, on Mar 25 2008, 07:56 AM, said:
(1♥)-pass-(2♥)-pass
(pass)-2♠
shows a classical t/o of hearts while dbl would be more minor oriented. Since a natural 2♠ is "impossible" be a hand that couldn't overcall immediately.
By the same token, 4♠ should show this hand. But ok, that doesn't give p the option of defending 4♥ so I suppose I have to double with this hand.
Fishbein comes back? I like it.
-P.J. Painter.
#7
Posted 2008-March-25, 07:41
helene_t, on Mar 25 2008, 12:56 PM, said:
(1♥)-pass-(2♥)-pass
(pass)-2♠
shows a classical t/o of hearts while dbl would be more minor oriented.
If you have a classical t/o of hearts, you dbl 1♥, no?
#8
Posted 2008-March-25, 10:01
Jlall, on Mar 25 2008, 07:27 AM, said:
Just thought about a good title for a new thread.
Agree with double.
- hrothgar
#10
Posted 2008-March-25, 19:11
Translation please; I have no idea what this means.
#11
Posted 2008-March-25, 19:15
whereagles, on Mar 25 2008, 02:41 PM, said:
helene_t, on Mar 25 2008, 12:56 PM, said:
(1♥)-pass-(2♥)-pass
(pass)-2♠
shows a classical t/o of hearts while dbl would be more minor oriented.
If you have a classical t/o of hearts, you dbl 1♥, no?
OK but you could have classical shape but being too weak for that. Or maybe you have spades plus one minor. (obviously this needs to be clarified, lest p takes out you spades/clubs 2♠ bid to 3♦).
#12
Posted 2008-March-25, 19:18
The_Hog, on Mar 25 2008, 08:11 PM, said:
Translation please; I have no idea what this means.
I'll bet you could work out it doesn't mean pass. Especially given the statement that followed the one you quoted.
#13
Posted 2008-March-25, 21:39
jdonn, on Mar 26 2008, 08:18 AM, said:
The_Hog, on Mar 25 2008, 08:11 PM, said:
Translation please; I have no idea what this means.
I'll bet you could work out it doesn't mean pass. Especially given the statement that followed the one you quoted.
Yes I did gather that there was a X coming. Still don't know what it means though.
#14
Posted 2008-March-25, 21:42
- hrothgar
#15
Posted 2008-March-25, 22:43
han, on Mar 26 2008, 10:42 AM, said:
Thx. Hmm. I didn't know the English language had changed as much since I have been living here in Laos.
#16
Posted 2008-March-25, 23:12
- hrothgar
#17
Posted 2008-March-26, 01:38
han, on Mar 26 2008, 12:12 PM, said:
Yeah they do, but unfortunately I am very slow in picking up Laos. Interestingly though, some of the Laos idiomatic expressions are almost identical to those we use in English.
eg "Two faced" is "two headed" in Laos .
#18
Posted 2008-March-26, 10:05
- hrothgar
#19 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-March-26, 15:50
han, on Mar 26 2008, 11:05 AM, said:
Han, he said two faced not two face.
http://www.urbandict...?term=two+faced
#20
Posted 2008-March-26, 16:37
- hrothgar

Help

ps-4♥-ps-ps
??