BBO Discussion Forums: Another familiar problem - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Another familiar problem

Poll: Your rebid (43 member(s) have cast votes)

Your rebid

  1. 1NT (10 votes [23.26%])

    Percentage of vote: 23.26%

  2. 2C (13 votes [30.23%])

    Percentage of vote: 30.23%

  3. 2D (16 votes [37.21%])

    Percentage of vote: 37.21%

  4. 2H (2 votes [4.65%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.65%

  5. 3D (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  6. Would've opened 1NT (2 votes [4.65%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.65%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,741
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2008-March-20, 02:23

You open 1♦ in third seat and partner responds 1♠. 2/1, 15-17 NTs.

Scoring: IMP

Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#2 User is online   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,398
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-March-20, 02:29

2c

I thought wtp but i guess not.
0

#3 User is offline   effervesce 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 885
  • Joined: 2007-March-28

Posted 2008-March-20, 02:40

All options look pretty ew to me - 2D rebid seems the smallest lie.
Ming

--Always remember you're unique. Just like everyone else.
0

#4 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2008-March-20, 04:27

2D. Would not be fussed if pd bid 1NT. Would be fussed if pd bid 2C.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#5 User is online   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,218
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-March-20, 04:54

mike777, on Mar 20 2008, 03:29 AM, said:

2c

I thought wtp but i guess not.

Declareing a 2C bid as wtp,
is a bit surprings.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#6 User is online   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,218
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-March-20, 04:56

Hi,

2H.

It is either 2D or 2H, I would go
with 2H, but ...

Even the forum software was against
2H, I needed to hit the Add button 3x,
before I was able to write my opinion.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#7 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2008-March-20, 05:08

I like 2♥. Alternative: 2♦ if I'm in a pessimistic mood. Which maybe I should because that singleton spade ain't looking good.
0

#8 User is offline   effervesce 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 885
  • Joined: 2007-March-28

Posted 2008-March-20, 05:17

2H? Making a reverse on a 15 count without a known fit? The aces and kings are nice but it seems too much of an overbid imo.
Ming

--Always remember you're unique. Just like everyone else.
0

#9 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2008-March-20, 05:32

You're just too conservative :ph34r:
0

#10 User is offline   Cascade 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 6,772
  • Joined: 2003-July-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Zealand
  • Interests:Juggling, Unicycling

Posted 2008-March-20, 05:35

1NT seems normal to me.
Wayne Burrows

I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon

#11 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2008-March-20, 05:37

I don't hate 1N or 2♦ too much and would probably go for 1N.

2♥ is crazy. 2♣ is masterminding for the hell of it.
0

#12 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2008-March-20, 07:16

2♦. I might rebid 1NT with a non-regular. (1NT show 5332 18-19 with my regulars.)
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#13 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,725
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2008-March-20, 07:19

It probably won't surprise anyone to hear that I would have opened 1NT on the previous round
Alderaan delenda est
0

#14 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2008-March-20, 08:05

My rebid would be 2D but I would have opened 1NT.
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#15 User is offline   brianshark 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 895
  • Joined: 2006-May-13
  • Location:Dublin
  • Interests:Artificial Intelligence, Computer Games, Satire, Football, Rugby... and Bridge I suppose.

Posted 2008-March-20, 08:15

2♦ wtp.

1NT (as either an opening or rebid) is a distortion which is fine if it's your partnership's style, but it is not standard. 2♣ likewise. In my opinion, this hand does not warrant upgrading to 2♥ (or 3♦) because your singleton is in partner's suit.
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is.
0

#16 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-March-20, 09:53

I think 2♣ > 2♦ > open 1NT >>> 2♥ > rebid 1NT.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#17 User is offline   foo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,380
  • Joined: 2003-September-24

Posted 2008-March-20, 10:25

awm, on Mar 20 2008, 03:23 AM, said:

You open 1♦ in third seat and partner responds 1♠. 2/1, 15-17 NTs.

North,Both,IMP,
♠6 ♥KQ86 ♦AQT64 ♣A83

To a certain extent, this is another area where you should do what partner and you have agreed to do above and beyond all else.

W/o discussion in a pickup playing SAYC or normal 2/1 GF, either
1D-1S;1N (you certainly have all the side suits stopped) or
1D-1S;2D (AQTxx is a better than average 5 card suit)
seems fine to me

1D-1S;2C is Masterminding. If 2C! is artificial, you could make a good case for it.

1D-1S;2H is over bidding your hand.
Reverses should promise hands that have 3 level safety opposite a minimum.
15+6= 21 w/o a fit does not fit the requirement.
Pard is unlimited and could easily put you in a hopeless contract.

Those playing Weak NT's have 2 choices.
rebid the D's
play 1D-1M;2C! as artificial.

Kaplan Sheinwald had both options 40+ years ago.
0

#18 User is offline   inquiry 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 14,566
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amelia Island, FL
  • Interests:Bridge, what else?

Posted 2008-March-20, 10:45

In the olden days, worried about a rebid, we would have opened south a "prepared" 1♥ and rebid 2♦ and be fairly happy...sigh.... here i rebid an unhappy 1NT or unhappy 2♣
--Ben--

#19 User is offline   foo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,380
  • Joined: 2003-September-24

Posted 2008-March-20, 10:53

inquiry, on Mar 20 2008, 11:45 AM, said:

In the olden days, worried about a rebid, we would have opened south a "prepared" 1♥ and rebid 2♦ and be fairly happy...sigh.... here i rebid an unhappy 1NT or unhappy 2♣

...and playing 4cM and Strong NT, I might still open a 1H and rebid (an unhappy)2D.

It works for the Acol folks...
0

#20 User is offline   Echognome 

  • Deipnosophist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,386
  • Joined: 2005-March-22

Posted 2008-March-20, 11:20

jdonn, on Mar 20 2008, 07:53 AM, said:

I think 2♣ > 2♦ > open 1NT >>> 2♥ > rebid 1NT.

I'm generally in agreement here, except I would have ranked the rebid 1NT higher.

Imagine we held x KJxx AQTxx Axx, it seems to me this would now have more support for a 1NT rebid and in particular if we held x KJxx AQTx Axxx then I think a 1NT rebid would be normal. The major advantage being that we will be less likely to play in a 5-1 spade fit if we rebid 1NT rather than open 1NT.

So for me: 2♣ > 2♦ > rebid 1NT > open 1NT >> 2♥.
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users