BBO Discussion Forums: 5=3=5=v - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

5=3=5=v

#1 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,474
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2008-March-16, 17:32

Scoring: IMP

1♠-1NT
2♦-2♠
- - -
1NT is not forcing, but can include hands with 3 card ♠ and 4 to 6 HCP. So partner has:
- 3 card ♠ and 4 to 6 HCP
OR
- 6 to 9 HCP and simple preference for ♠
Do you bid more?
Bridge Single Dummy Program: https://github.com/k...eDummy/releases
0

#2 User is offline   655321 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,502
  • Joined: 2007-December-22

Posted 2008-March-16, 17:43

Pass
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
0

#3 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,401
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2008-March-16, 18:06

4.5 adjusted LTC suggests an invite, but LTC is not really adequate if we don't have a fit, and besides p will not be able to make an informed decision because he will assume we have values in diamonds.

So pass.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#4 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2008-March-16, 18:33

Pass. I might actually make 2♠ after this auction for once in my life.
0

#5 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-March-17, 00:11

I also pass. This is different from the hand that Phil posted some weeks ago because there we were more likely to have a heart fit and our side suit was much better.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#6 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2008-March-17, 00:15

I like bidding, so I'm going with 3H :P
As we're NV, I'm also content with pass as well.
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#7 User is offline   Cascade 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 6,772
  • Joined: 2003-July-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Zealand
  • Interests:Juggling, Unicycling

Posted 2008-March-17, 03:19

han, on Mar 17 2008, 07:11 PM, said:

I also pass. This is different from the hand that Phil posted some weeks ago because there we were more likely to have a heart fit and our side suit was much better.

And our second suit was a major so game is more likely in the second denomination. (Assuming I am thinking of the same hand.)

Maybe this is what you meant - i am just spelling it out clearly.
Wayne Burrows

I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon

#8 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-March-17, 11:17

Yes, that was what I meant with "we are more likely to have a heart fit", thanks for clarifying. :)
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#9 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2008-March-17, 16:37

if partner has 9hcp and 2 spades I don't really want to be in game.

if partner has 6hcp and 3 spades where will his values be (clubs) and what chances will game have after a trump lead (none) ?

let's just try to make this.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#10 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,474
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2008-March-17, 17:22

I passed and asked a good player afterwards. He said I should have bid 3♦ because it allows you to possibly find a better ♦ fit or a game in ♠...Probably he has influenced by knowing all 4 hands:
Scoring: IMP

RHO had ♠KJx.
LHO did lead a ♣, ruffed by me. ♥A and K and ♥ ruff.
I let ♠9 run and after dawing trumps played ♦ to the K.
...2♠+4
Bridge Single Dummy Program: https://github.com/k...eDummy/releases
0

#11 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2008-March-18, 01:23

1. Partner is maximum
2. He has (nearly) no useless values in clubs
3. He has a heart doubleton and great values in Diamonds.
4. Trumps split 3-2 with both finesses working.

Okay, now you don't aim for a slam and for the game you need a little less. But however you see it, you need at leawst two tricks from partner. So KQx of Diamonds and out is enough, but AkQ in club is useless if he has no entry.

I think it was no crime to miss this game, but if I have to blame someone then your partner. It is true that he has just 6HCP and 3 card support. But he has a very useful shortness, 5 of his 6 points are very nice, so he was at least on the border to a direct 2 Spade bid.
Kind Regards

Roland

Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#12 User is offline   foo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,380
  • Joined: 2003-September-24

Posted 2008-March-18, 06:14

kgr, on Mar 17 2008, 06:22 PM, said:

I passed and asked a good player afterwards. He said I should have bid 3♦ because it allows you to possibly find a better ♦ fit or a game in ♠...Probably he has influenced by knowing all 4 hands:
South,None,IMP,

♠986 ♥xx ♦KQx ♣Jxxxx
♠AQT7x ♥AKx ♦JTxxx

RHO had ♠KJx.
LHO did lead a ♣, ruffed by me. ♥A and K and ♥ ruff.
I let ♠9 run and after dawing trumps played ♦ to the K.
...2♠+4

Unless you are playing Constructive Raises, the standard response with
xxx, xx, KQx, Jxxxx to 1S-??
is ...2S.

Not 1N.

Then Opener can make whatever Game Try System allows for here.

I agree with others that this is not a board where I would expect to find game or would feel bad if We did not.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users