Any strong feelings on the best call?
Simply respond to a takeout double
#4
Posted 2008-March-06, 03:31
1 NT.
2C, 2D are out, since they show nothing,
the only alternative is 2NT.
Depending on your t/o style, partner may
be allowed to stretch in case he faces a passed
partner, i.e. you may not have full values
oppossite.
If you will always face full values, go ahead and
bid 2NT, but I think 1NT is enough.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#5
Posted 2008-March-06, 03:37
So the choices are between 1NT and 2♠.
2♠ depends on your agreements about a cuebid here, if it is not suitable, 1NT looks like your only choice.
#6 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-March-06, 04:35
#7
Posted 2008-March-06, 07:14
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#8
Posted 2008-March-06, 07:55
Jlall, on Mar 6 2008, 11:35 AM, said:
What would a maximum look like?
#9
Posted 2008-March-06, 08:31
#11
Posted 2008-March-06, 10:47
Partner held a xx/Kxx/AKxxx/Axx and there were nine top tricks. Only one pair (of sixteen) bid 3NT on the board in the MBC and they had no opposition bidding.
Paul
#12
Posted 2008-March-06, 11:41
cardsharp, on Mar 6 2008, 08:47 AM, said:
Partner held a xx/Kxx/AKxxx/Axx and there were nine top tricks. Only one pair (of sixteen) bid 3NT on the board in the MBC and they had no opposition bidding.
Paul
Unless your takeout doubles promise an opening bid, I think 8-11 for 1N and 12-13 for 2N is necessary.
Like Justin, this isn't a maximum 1N for me, especially with a single stop.
I might invite with your partner's hand, I'm not sure.
#13 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-March-06, 12:23
gnasher, on Mar 6 2008, 08:55 AM, said:
Jlall, on Mar 6 2008, 11:35 AM, said:
What would a maximum look like?
I would bid 1N routinely with 11s. So you can add a jack anywhere to this hand and I'd bid 1N.
#14 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-March-06, 12:23
cardsharp, on Mar 6 2008, 11:47 AM, said:
Partner held a xx/Kxx/AKxxx/Axx and there were nine top tricks. Only one pair (of sixteen) bid 3NT on the board in the MBC and they had no opposition bidding.
Paul
The other hand has a normal 2N bid IMO.
#15
Posted 2008-March-06, 14:30
Jlall, on Mar 7 2008, 07:23 AM, said:
cardsharp, on Mar 6 2008, 11:47 AM, said:
Partner held a xx/Kxx/AKxxx/Axx and there were nine top tricks. Only one pair (of sixteen) bid 3NT on the board in the MBC and they had no opposition bidding.
Paul
The other hand has a normal 2N bid IMO.
... and you would go on with your "medium"?
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#17
Posted 2008-March-06, 14:44
- hrothgar
#18
Posted 2008-March-06, 15:10
#19 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-March-06, 15:11
Cascade, on Mar 6 2008, 03:30 PM, said:
Jlall, on Mar 7 2008, 07:23 AM, said:
cardsharp, on Mar 6 2008, 11:47 AM, said:
Partner held a xx/Kxx/AKxxx/Axx and there were nine top tricks. Only one pair (of sixteen) bid 3NT on the board in the MBC and they had no opposition bidding.
Paul
The other hand has a normal 2N bid IMO.
... and you would go on with your "medium"?
What do you think "Wayne"?!
#20
Posted 2008-March-06, 16:32
- hrothgar

Help

Pass - (1♠) - Dbl - (Pass)
?
1♠ shows 4+ spades in a weak notrump system