BBO Discussion Forums: Fourth Seat Decision - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Fourth Seat Decision

Poll: Fourth Seat Decision (28 member(s) have cast votes)

Fourth Seat Decision

  1. Pass (17 votes [60.71%])

    Percentage of vote: 60.71%

  2. 1H (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. 2H (11 votes [39.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 39.29%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2008-March-03, 01:19

MPs, All Red

Qx QTxxxxx K Kxx

(P)-P-(P)-?
0

#2 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2008-March-03, 01:35

Pass! Not even worth thinking about.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#3 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Göttingen, Germany
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2008-March-03, 02:23

repeat after me: all four seat problems depend on your partner and opponents.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#4 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2008-March-03, 02:24

gwnn, on Mar 3 2008, 01:23 AM, said:

repeat after me: all four seat problems depend on your partner and opponents.

Partner is expert, opponents are not.
0

#5 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Göttingen, Germany
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2008-March-03, 02:25

OK.

what does expert partner open on?
what do nonexpert opps open on?
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#6 User is offline   raduv 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 6
  • Joined: 2005-January-19
  • Location:Brasov, Romania

Posted 2008-March-03, 02:53

pass, but worth thinking of it.
I'm tempted by 2[H] as it might buy the contract, buy I'm afraid I'll go overboard.
0

#7 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2008-March-03, 04:13

gwnn, on Mar 3 2008, 03:23 AM, said:

repeat after me: all four seat problems depend on your partner and opponents.

Amen. There are certain situations in which I wouldn't dream of passing this hand out, or virtually any hand unless I had so little I was sure the opponents had made a mistake.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#8 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,726
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2008-March-03, 10:59

I'd normally pass this out. Have to be at the table to know though.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#9 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2008-March-03, 11:33

Wow this is close. I hate to pass out hands that will negate our advantage in defense or declarer play, and this is a real pile o'cheese.

I'd probably open this 2 in all honesty. Many good things can happen that will create a plus score for us. It could go all pass, or we could pick up a plus defending. By passing, you are condemning yourself to whatever the field is doing not only in your seat, but in other seats as well.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#10 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,399
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2008-March-03, 11:39

Easy pass, even opposite a fairly sound opener

Give me a 6 card Spade suit and I'd be much more likely to bid
Alderaan delenda est
0

#11 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2008-March-03, 23:53

pclayton, on Mar 4 2008, 12:33 AM, said:

Wow this is close. I hate to pass out hands that will negate our advantage in defense or declarer play, and this is a real pile o'cheese.

I'd probably open this 2 in all honesty. Many good things can happen that will create a plus score for us. It could go all pass, or we could pick up a plus defending. By passing, you are condemning yourself to whatever the field is doing not only in your seat, but in other seats as well.

2H in 4th seat is a far better hand than this for most players. You will not make a game unless your pd has 3 Aces and she can't have that. A 4th seat 2 H opening shows not a weak 2, but about 8 tricks for most people. Who plays weak 2s in 4th seat?
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#12 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-March-03, 23:56

The_Hog, on Mar 4 2008, 12:53 AM, said:

Who plays weak 2s in 4th seat?

I play it as about 10-12, never ever heard of anybody playing 2H as 8 tricks but then, I haven't met most people yet.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#13 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2008-March-04, 02:48

han, on Mar 4 2008, 06:56 AM, said:

I play it as about 10-12, never ever heard of anybody playing 2H as 8 tricks but then, I haven't met most people yet.

Playing it as eight tricks is more common in countries where Acol two-bids used to be the norm - when people switched to weak twos in first, second and third, they sometimes left the fourth-seat openings unchanged.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#14 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2008-March-04, 05:20

definitely pass... we got squat
0

#15 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2008-March-04, 10:45

gnasher, on Mar 4 2008, 03:48 AM, said:

han, on Mar 4 2008, 06:56 AM, said:

I play it as about 10-12, never ever heard of anybody playing 2H as 8 tricks but then, I haven't met most people yet.

Playing it as eight tricks is more common in countries where Acol two-bids used to be the norm - when people switched to weak twos in first, second and third, they sometimes left the fourth-seat openings unchanged.

Weren't strong 2-bids the norm everywhere?

I'm going to poll some Dutch players to see if anybody still plays the 4th seat 2M as 8 tricks.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#16 User is offline   pclayton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,151
  • Joined: 2003-June-11
  • Location:Southern California

Posted 2008-March-04, 10:53

han, on Mar 3 2008, 09:56 PM, said:

The_Hog, on Mar 4 2008, 12:53 AM, said:

Who plays weak 2s in 4th seat?

I play it as about 10-12, never ever heard of anybody playing 2H as 8 tricks but then, I haven't met most people yet.

Same here. I hate my honor dispersion but the hand fits the description otherwise.

I know Meyerson opens 2 here. C'mon dude, STEP UP.
"Phil" on BBO
0

#17 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,516
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-March-04, 13:04

I didn't know The_Hog prefers ACOL.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#18 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,322
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2008-March-04, 14:03

pclayton, on Mar 4 2008, 11:53 AM, said:

I know Meyerson opens 2 here. C'mon dude, STEP UP.

I figured that my preferences were so well known that there was no need to comment.

Sure, I'll bid 2. My view is that opening 2 should be the worst possible hand with a six-card heart suit where you would open in fourth chair. With a good hand, why not keep the auction low to explore for game/slam? With a bad hand, why give the opponents an easy overcall at the one level?

While it's certainly possible that the opponents might have a spade fit and go plus when I open 2 on this hand, they will have to get into the auction with two passed hands at the two-level. It's rather dangerous to overcall 2 when my partner has a good description of my hand and a penalty double available and I'd be surprised if many passed hands are really well-suited to this action.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#19 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2008-March-04, 14:40

han, on Mar 4 2008, 05:45 PM, said:

Weren't strong 2-bids the norm everywhere?

Yes, but weren't they different? As I understand it, in Goren and Culbertson two-bids were game-forcing, whereas in British Acol they're a one-round force, and in some other British styles they were strong but non-forcing. There's more reason to retain an almost useless agreement than a completely useless one.

Quote

I'm going to poll some Dutch players to see if anybody still plays the 4th seat 2M as 8 tricks.

Hmm. I'm not sure that I want my assertions tested with real research. What if it turns out to have been a gross overgeneralisation? I was, in fact, thinking mainly of the UK and Ireland, so what I said was a bit of an overbid.

According to this thread:

http://groups.google.co.uk/group/rec.games...040bfe46b531559

the idea of playing weak twos in the first three positions but Acol twos in fourth originated with S J Simon.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#20 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2008-March-04, 21:41

I am a bit surprised that some are referring to a stronger bid in 4th seat as an Acol idea. A 4th seat opening really has nothing to do with Acol or 2/1 or any system for that matter. As I stated most, (in fact nearly all), the people I know would play a 2 level opening in pass out seat as at least an intermediate hand, in the range of 14-16, or about 8 playing tricks, certainly this is the norm here. Have a look at Klinger's ideas on balancing. A 3 level opening says "I have 9 tricks and only need 1 more from you".
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users