Newspaperitis. or something like it.
#1
Posted 2008-March-02, 14:48
At some point I either read, or heard an account of a bridge condition where the symptoms compel the individual player to attempt a spectacular/newspaper worthy play on every deal.
A good score is secondary to this need, a session of bridge is deemed a success regardless of the MP/IMP/whatever deficit, if the specs, opponents or p were wowed by some clever gambit or "genius" low percentage play.
anyhow, that's sort of how I recall it, but can't, for the life of me, recall if it was written about in a simon book, or paper, or these forums or what...
side questions -- how many players like this do you know?
are you one?
#2
Posted 2008-March-02, 16:09
- hrothgar
#3
Posted 2008-March-02, 16:33
-Bob
#4
Posted 2008-March-02, 16:49
Different matter if it's the national trials or something though.
#5
Posted 2008-March-02, 18:49
- hrothgar
#6
Posted 2008-March-02, 19:06
If you are not used to win, you would rather do anything
I remember after reading a lot of card playing books I was looking for special plays, but I hardly remember anything good I did.
#7
Posted 2008-March-02, 20:01
#9 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-March-02, 23:32
Fluffy, on Mar 2 2008, 08:06 PM, said:
If you are not used to win, you would rather do anything
I don't really agree, I would think that if you are used to winning you would hate losing so much that you wouldn't do anything that increases the amount of times you lose (like making a low percentage, ie bad, line.) Really I don't even care much about winning for local things anymore, it's just that I hate losing to morons so much that I feel compelled to try my best.
I think this really comes down to personality though.
#10
Posted 2008-March-03, 00:32
1-- learning is more important then winning. Beginner usually focus more on learning then on winning
2-- learning new tricks that you want to put in practice. At one point in learning you want to learn everything even if they are not that relevant in practice and any new tricks that you put in practice give greater satisfaction then winning (like your first trump squeeze)
3--Wanting to win because you are tired of losing. Average player tired of being in the middle often have strong winning instinct. They are also looking for recognition.
4- you have many win & many losses because of luck so you are focussing on playing solidly and dont mind losing if you play well. But you are still having a hard time accepting yours and partner mistakes.
5- You have win and lost often made brillant and stupid mistakes that you`ve realized that games are a complex thing and the fact that we make mistake in them is why we play them. This is the golden age of being able to accept defeat twist of fate and stupid mistakes with a smile.
6- winning is everything. When you are really focussed toward a goal it somewhat become obsessive. Some champion that are "in winning is everything" will tend to bend ethics, have low patience and sometimes choke under pressure. They are however the hardest worker and know every tricks to get advantage. (psychological, legal, etc)
I would say that newspaperits is between 2,3 & 4
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#11
Posted 2008-March-03, 02:14
#12
Posted 2008-March-03, 03:59
Jlall, on Mar 3 2008, 06:29 PM, said:
lol
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#13
Posted 2008-March-03, 08:19
it is sometimes also called "playing for the galerie".
You may or may not add certain behaviours, gestures
made on the table.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#14
Posted 2008-March-03, 09:00
The infliction of cruelty with a good conscience is a delight to moralists — that is why they invented hell. — Bertrand Russell
#15
Posted 2008-March-03, 12:29
Could this be the rare Full Arkwright ?
Experts and professionals generally confine themselves to the much more common Half-Arkwright which may be undertaken in favourable weather conditions provided no more than 1 foot remains in contact with the ground.
The Full Arkwright requires that NO body-part may be in contact with the ground or any other surface as the accompanying manoever (eg backwash squeeze) is attempted.
Nowdays, only the gifted amateur is likely to have the combination of skill and agility to make the attempt.
Glad to have been of assistance
Dogsbreath
#16
Posted 2008-March-03, 19:04

Help
