BBO Discussion Forums: What do you lead at T2 (defensive question)? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

What do you lead at T2 (defensive question)?

Poll: What do you lead at T2 (defensive question)? (7 member(s) have cast votes)

What do you lead at T2 (defensive question)?

  1. Low club (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  2. King of clubs (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. Ace of diamonds (1 votes [14.29%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.29%

  4. Small Diamond (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  5. Spade (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  6. Trump (6 votes [85.71%])

    Percentage of vote: 85.71%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   akhare 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,261
  • Joined: 2005-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-March-02, 19:37

IMP, white vs. red, you you deal and open 1 and an insane auction develops:

1 - (X) - 1 - (1) - 2 - (2) - P - (P) - 3 - (4) (sic) - X - (P) - P - (XX) (!!!).

You hold:

XXX
J
AT9
AK9XXX

You lead the A and dummy tables:

AKTX
AK
XX
QTXXX

Both pard and declarer play their stiff s (declarer had J in case it matters).

Anyway, you are lead on T2 and what do you lead and why? You may assume a reasonable pard if that helps.
foobar on BBO
0

#2 User is offline   ceeb 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 243
  • Joined: 2007-June-14

Posted 2008-March-03, 00:43

trump

Declarer appears to have 6 hearts (else pd is what -- xx,10xxxx,KQJxx,x? 1=5=6=1 leaves declarer an absurd, even for LHO's friend, 5=5=2=1) and a singleton. Trusting pd doesn't hold xxxx,Q109x,QJxx,x I'll win the club continuation and continue with a low diamond.
0

#3 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2008-March-03, 06:53

Better if you make the bidding in various lines

1♣ - (X) - 1♦ - (1♥) -
2♣ - (2♥) - P - (P) -
3♣ - (4♥) (sic) - X - (P) -
P - (XX) (!!!). - P - (P)
P


Anyway trump back seems best.
0

#4 User is offline   Cascade 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 6,772
  • Joined: 2003-July-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Zealand
  • Interests:Juggling, Unicycling

Posted 2008-March-03, 12:36

Trump for me too.

This bidding is incredibly insane. Actually much worse than that. The guy with five clubs doubles and then raises hearts the second time a jump with doubleton AK.
Wayne Burrows

I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon

#5 User is offline   akhare 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,261
  • Joined: 2005-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-March-04, 01:30

Well, anything but a minor suit lead brings down the curtains for the D :( .

Pard held:

XXXXX
QX
KQJTX
x

Declarer had:

QXX
TXXXXX
XXX
J

AK of , AK of , ruff to hand, Q pitching = 6, 3 + 1 ruff for 10 tricks B).

IMO, it doesn't hurt to cash in A (or lead a low ) to see what pard says --after all pard took two free bids and must have K or QJXX of for the X. You can argue that the correct bid over the first X is 1, the disparity of the suits notwithstanding.

Maybe I am reading too much into this -- a fix is a fix is a fix ;)...
foobar on BBO
0

#6 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2008-March-04, 02:42

akhare, on Mar 4 2008, 08:30 AM, said:

Pard held:

XXXXX
QX
KQJTX
x

Declarer had:

QXX
TXXXXX
XXX
J

This pack of cards contains 15 spades and 11 hearts. I wouldn't normally mind, but I was relying on some of those hearts to take tricks for our side.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#7 User is offline   akhare 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,261
  • Joined: 2005-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-March-04, 15:16

gnasher, on Mar 4 2008, 03:42 AM, said:

akhare, on Mar 4 2008, 08:30 AM, said:

Pard held:

XXXXX
QX
KQJTX
x

Declarer had:

QXX
TXXXXX
XXX
J

This pack of cards contains 15 spades and 11 hearts. I wouldn't normally mind, but I was relying on some of those hearts to take tricks for our side.

How so?

Declarer: QXX of
Pard: XXXXX of
Dummy: AK of
Dealer: XXX of

Declarer: TXXXXX of
Pard: QX of
Dummy: AKXX of
Dealer: X of
foobar on BBO
0

#8 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2008-March-04, 15:32

atul said:

You hold:

XXX
J
AT9
AK9XXX

You lead the A♣ and dummy tables:

AKTX
AK
XX
QTXXX


atul, on later, said:


How so?

Declarer: QXX of ♠
Pard: XXXXX of ♠
Dummy: AK of ♠
Dealer: XXX of ♠

Declarer: TXXXXX of ♥
Pard: QX of ♥
Dummy: AKXX of ♥
Dealer: X of ♥

... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users