Feeling lucky? Opps can be so annoying
#21
Posted 2008-February-28, 11:29
2. Don't like 4♠, but not as much as I hate 1♠.
Some joker left the heart suit out of this deck.
Since I have advertised ♠KJxxxx ♥AQx ♦Ax ♣Ax with my previous bidding, I'm really at a total loss on what pard is bidding 5 over 5 on.
I hate to guess, but more importantly, I hate for pard to have to guess.
#22
Posted 2008-February-28, 13:01
Codo, on Feb 28 2008, 08:18 AM, said:
skaeran, on Feb 28 2008, 02:56 PM, said:
I agree with you, besides, it looks a LITTLE strange? Looks very strange to me.
I didn't really think I had to add a smiley there.
Harald
#23
Posted 2008-February-28, 14:55
pclayton, on Feb 29 2008, 06:29 AM, said:
I think you might bid 4♠ on a whole lot less than that with more distribution.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#25
Posted 2008-February-28, 15:17
cherdano, on Feb 28 2008, 05:10 PM, said:
Yeah yeah, its very easy to put a single bidding, think of these 2 sequences:
1♠-3♥-3♠-5♥
1♣-3♥-pass-5♥
you can switch ♥ with ♦ if you want.
#26
Posted 2008-February-28, 15:23
1♣-3♥-p-5♥
is about 25 times less frequent an auction than
1♠-3♥-3♠-5♥
which is 15 times less frequent than
1♠-4♥-p-p
George Carlin
#27
Posted 2008-February-28, 15:24
#28
Posted 2008-February-28, 15:26
gwnn, on Feb 28 2008, 04:23 PM, said:
1♣-3♥-p-5♥
is about 25 times less frequent an auction than
1♠-3♥-3♠-5♥
which is 15 times less frequent than
1♠-4♥-p-p
If I open 1♠, it might go
1♠-2♦-4♦-5♦
which is easy.
But, if I open 1♣, it might go
1♣-7♦-X-P-?
which is hard.
-P.J. Painter.
#29
Posted 2008-February-28, 15:39
kenrexford, on Feb 28 2008, 04:26 PM, said:
gwnn, on Feb 28 2008, 04:23 PM, said:
1♣-3♥-p-5♥
is about 25 times less frequent an auction than
1♠-3♥-3♠-5♥
which is 15 times less frequent than
1♠-4♥-p-p
If I open 1♠, it might go
1♠-2♦-4♦-5♦
which is easy.
But, if I open 1♣, it might go
1♣-7♦-X-P-?
which is hard.
LOL, nice one Ken.
- hrothgar
#30
Posted 2008-February-28, 19:14
#31
Posted 2008-February-28, 19:23
kenrexford, on Feb 28 2008, 09:26 PM, said:
gwnn, on Feb 28 2008, 04:23 PM, said:
1♣-3♥-p-5♥
is about 25 times less frequent an auction than
1♠-3♥-3♠-5♥
which is 15 times less frequent than
1♠-4♥-p-p
If I open 1♠, it might go
1♠-2♦-4♦-5♦
which is easy.
But, if I open 1♣, it might go
1♣-7♦-X-P-?
which is hard.
My point was about the fact that anyone can invent any convention and then invent a bidding sequence where it works, and it probes nothing.
But Ken will always be the best inventing I guess
One of the things I love from those who open 1♣ is that they will then have obvious rebids of 3/4♠, but it doesn't matter if they have 6 losers or only 2, they have their call.
#32
Posted 2008-February-28, 21:29
#33
Posted 2008-February-29, 16:05
jchiu, on Feb 29 2008, 03:29 AM, said:
That 1♠ opening is prefectly correct.

Help
