You are playing in a BBO indie. Your partner is a starred player from a small country in eastern Europe. The opponents regard themselves as experts. This is the first board. I considered this a difficult choice of bids. Do you agree? What would your bid have been?
What to bid? Competitive Auction
#1
Posted 2008-February-26, 20:14
You are playing in a BBO indie. Your partner is a starred player from a small country in eastern Europe. The opponents regard themselves as experts. This is the first board. I considered this a difficult choice of bids. Do you agree? What would your bid have been?
#2
Posted 2008-February-26, 21:12
#3
Posted 2008-February-26, 21:24
#4
Posted 2008-February-26, 21:26
Although I would bid 4♥ here always, I don't feel strongly about it, if that makes sense.
I don't expect 4♥ to make - my guess would be one down - but sometimes it will make.
But sometimes 3♠ will make, sometimes they will bid 4♠ and get doubled.
It just seems that good things happen more often when you support partner, even on a hand with such ratty support as this one.
#5
Posted 2008-February-26, 22:08
4♥ is really an overbid here. Pard didn't open a weak 2 so he has 6 weak hearts or only 5.
Our spade holding really couldn't be worse, and it's doubtful pard needs the pitch.
#6
Posted 2008-February-26, 23:25
pclayton, on Feb 27 2008, 11:08 AM, said:
4♥ is really an overbid here. Pard didn't open a weak 2 so he has 6 weak hearts or only 5.
Our spade holding really couldn't be worse, and it's doubtful pard needs the pitch.
Agree 100%
#7
Posted 2008-February-27, 02:00
I had have much more problems with an unpassed partner in an indy, cause I would not even know if 2 Heart as forcing is still standard?
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#8
Posted 2008-February-27, 02:03
Codo, on Feb 27 2008, 01:00 AM, said:
I had have much more problems with an unpassed partner in an indy, cause I would not even know if 2 Heart as forcing is still standard?
Yes, it would be forcing.
#9
Posted 2008-February-27, 02:49
Even opposite a prime collection like x AQ10xx Axxx Jxx 4H is going to need a lot of luck, whereas 3S will probably go down.
I think the chance of the opponents saving against 4H is slim - their trumps are poor, LHO probably doesn't have a strong side suit, and they know they may already have forced me to guess.
A harder problem is what to do on the next round if partner doubles for takeout in the passout seat. I think I'd leave it in.
#10
Posted 2008-February-27, 03:31
P-P-1♣-1♠
2♥-3♠!-???
The hand was played only four times, twice at 4♥ (down one), once at 2NT (down one), and once at 3♠ (down 2). I lost -1.33 IMP by bidding 4♥ - hey, it's a bidder's game. E-W were very aggressive both with the 1♠ overcall (I would make this every time) and the 3♠ raise (not to my taste with 4-3-4-2 shape and no spade honor).
At one table, N-S bid to 4♥ with no interference. At another, South bid 2NT after East raised to 2♠ only (kinda weird). At the fourth table, East took the push to 3♠ after West passed over 1♣, then came in with 2♠ after N-S bid 1♣ - 1♥ -1NT, and then North competed with 3♣. The bidding at indies can be a barrel of laughs.
#11
Posted 2008-February-27, 04:57
#13
Posted 2008-February-27, 13:08
whereagles, on Feb 27 2008, 11:57 PM, said:
I don't think KJx is a good enough stopper for 3NT on this auction. We will too often need to lose the lead and get a spade through for a quick set.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#14
Posted 2008-February-27, 13:44
Cascade, on Feb 27 2008, 07:08 PM, said:
You think so? Well, if pard happens to have the ♦A, all we need is to setup hearts without letting the hand go to RHO.
#15
Posted 2008-February-27, 13:55
#16
Posted 2008-February-27, 13:57
helene_t, on Feb 27 2008, 02:55 PM, said:
For me, 2♥ looks about right, but I consider a 2♥ call in this sequence to be a call that looks like a "fit jump" without the jump. The fact that 1♠ deprived me of the ability to jump to 2♥ does not change the character of the bid.
-P.J. Painter.
#17
Posted 2008-February-27, 14:42
helene_t, on Feb 27 2008, 08:55 PM, said:
I disagree with 2♥, this is a negX to me.
I'd have bid 4♥ most probably.
Harald
#18
Posted 2008-February-27, 15:42
helene_t, on Feb 27 2008, 07:55 PM, said:
Agree with her as always
#19
Posted 2008-February-27, 16:27
The opening poster's partner on the hand was from Eastern Europe - perhaps he plays negative free bids.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#20
Posted 2008-February-27, 21:40

Help

P-P-1♣-1♠
2♥-3♠-????