Surely he meant that hand without the club queen.
Defend 3N
#21
Posted 2008-January-15, 03:16
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.
- hrothgar
- hrothgar
#22
Posted 2008-January-15, 03:18
Ah, oops. You're too fast for me Han, I'm still editing to see if I goofed up.
I should have realized something was up.
Regardless, my gut tells me to encourage spades, so it is probably wrong.
I should have realized something was up.
Regardless, my gut tells me to encourage spades, so it is probably wrong.
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy - but it might improve my bridge.
#23
Posted 2008-January-15, 03:32
gnasher, on Jan 15 2008, 08:59 AM, said:
Therefore he has QJx Jxx Kx(x) AKQx(x), and I should discourage.
Sorry - that should have read QJx Jxx Kx(x) AKxx(x)
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn

Help
