How many got this right?
#1
Posted 2008-January-07, 15:20
♠Q
♥xx
♠x
♥AQ
LHO is known to have both Kings. You simply had to count the hand and determine if LHO bared the ♥K or not.
I would consider this to be a Bridgemaster level II hand and I would expect that all of the intermediates on BBF to get this hand right at the table.
Guess what percentage of the declarers got this hand right?
#2
Posted 2008-January-07, 15:36
#3
Posted 2008-January-07, 15:47
the answer is obv 0%, cause it's basically impossible for everyone to get it right and it's unlikely that the number of times the contract was played is divisible by 10.
George Carlin
#4
Posted 2008-January-07, 16:07
The infliction of cruelty with a good conscience is a delight to moralists that is why they invented hell. Bertrand Russell
#5
Posted 2008-January-08, 03:05
#6
Posted 2008-January-08, 03:13
I voted 10%, although Csaba's argument is good.
#7 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-January-08, 03:15
#8
Posted 2008-January-08, 07:52
Experienced honeymoon bridge players get this one right because it occurs so often.
#9
Posted 2008-January-08, 08:08
So I agree with 10%.
Read Larry Cohen's article in a recent bridge world about a 'routine' declarer play hand (I think it was an endplay, can't remember) from the Life masters pairs, and how few people took the technical line.
#10
Posted 2008-January-08, 08:25
In Baltimore, 10% is about right.
#11
Posted 2008-January-08, 08:43
#12
Posted 2008-January-08, 10:25
The correct answer: ZERO percent. I would have guessed 10% myself, but the only other decent pair (they won the 0-5000 mini blues in SF) in the entire room was sitting in the other section.
I was the LHO here. As I was discarding, I thought - hmmm, should I bare the ♥K?
I quickly put that thought out of my mind.
#13
Posted 2008-January-08, 10:37
pclayton, on Jan 8 2008, 06:25 PM, said:
I can solve most BM 3 problems and a few BM 4 problems so of course I could solve this one in theory, but I probably wouldn't solve it at the table. There is a big difference.
#14 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2008-January-08, 11:07
helene_t, on Jan 8 2008, 11:37 AM, said:
pclayton, on Jan 8 2008, 06:25 PM, said:
I can solve most BM 3 problems and a few BM 4 problems so of course I could solve this one in theory, but I probably wouldn't solve it at the table. There is a big difference.
Just want to echo this. There is a huge difference in having a bridge problem, knowing its a bridge problem, and having infinite time to think as opposed to just playing a hand that you don't know is a problem and having a set amount of time and having to focus on a bunch of other things. I would guess that a lot of the BBF advanced/experts would get some of the hands that are posted on the beginner/int forum wrong at the table some % of the time.
#16
Posted 2008-January-08, 11:23
FrancesHinden, on Jan 8 2008, 09:13 AM, said:
That's intriguing. Frequently, I'll make a rush to judgment on BBF without thinking about the hand too much, or sometimes when I post there are external distractions.
When I'm at the table, there's a rhythm to the play, and hopefully not a lot to distract me besides the time clock or the director hovering, so I'd like to think I can solve problems better at the table.
Of course, I don't have the luxury of a scratchpad, or RP's bridge calculators either.
#17
Posted 2008-January-08, 11:24
pclayton, on Jan 8 2008, 11:23 AM, said:
FrancesHinden, on Jan 8 2008, 09:13 AM, said:
That's intriguing. Frequently, I'll make a rush to judgment on BBF without thinking about the hand too much, or sometimes when I post there are external distractions.
When I'm at the table, there's a rhythm to the play, and hopefully not a lot to distract me besides the time clock or the director hovering, so I'd like to think I can solve problems better at the table. I
I would hope so
#18
Posted 2008-January-08, 11:29
#19
Posted 2008-January-08, 12:52
FrancesHinden, on Jan 8 2008, 05:13 PM, said:
I wish I could analyse on BBF as well as you play at the table.
#20
Posted 2008-January-08, 12:57
I don't really consider this to be BMII, though. First you have to assume that everyone is counting... which stops for the majority of people once they realize they have their 10th trick. 'If we get an overtrick... great, but I don't really care.'
Second, even if they are counting there's that element of fear that they may have done so wrong and so somehow blow the contract if they try to endplay LHO.
Frankly I'd be surprised if it even was 10%. Take me to a regional and give me odds and then I might go some std. deviation higher.

Help
