What is 2NT? New partnership online.
#1
Posted 2008-January-04, 07:55
How would you understand that bid?
Modified: Direct seat.
#3
Posted 2008-January-04, 08:04
1. I would probably forget.
2. I like the three-level for one-suited pre-empts.
Roland
#4
Posted 2008-January-04, 08:23
However, the question is perhaps ambiguous...is the 2NT overcall in direct or balancing seat?
#5
Posted 2008-January-04, 08:24
#6
Posted 2008-January-04, 08:31
helene_t, on Jan 4 2008, 04:24 PM, said:
Agreed, although Hedy Grey, during a vugraph broadcast the other day, said that for her the range is 17-19. I confess that I have not seen that concept before.
Roland
#7
Posted 2008-January-04, 08:42
Walddk, on Jan 4 2008, 03:31 PM, said:
helene_t, on Jan 4 2008, 04:24 PM, said:
Agreed, although Hedy Grey, during a vugraph broadcast the other day, said that for her the range is 17-19. I confess that I have not seen that concept before.
Roland
Well I suppose that she plays
1NT 10-14
X and then 1NT 15-17-
2NT : 17-19-
X and then 2NT 19+-21
I also prefer to keep 2NT to show basically the same stength as a 2NT opening.
Alain
#8
Posted 2008-January-04, 08:48
joker_gib, on Jan 4 2008, 04:42 PM, said:
Walddk, on Jan 4 2008, 03:31 PM, said:
helene_t, on Jan 4 2008, 04:24 PM, said:
Agreed, although Hedy Grey, during a vugraph broadcast the other day, said that for her the range is 17-19. I confess that I have not seen that concept before.
Roland
Well I suppose that she plays
1NT 10-14
X and then 1NT 15-17-
2NT : 17-19-
X and then 2NT 19+-21
Most likely, but she will not always be in a position to rebid 1NT.
1♥ pass pass double
Now, if the response is 2mi the rebid is 2NT to show 15-16 and that is not sound opposite what may well be a weak hand. Neither is it a splendid idea to let a direct 2NT show 17-19. 17 opposite nothing perhaps?
Sorry for being a bit off-topic here.
Roland
#9
Posted 2008-January-04, 10:50
#10
Posted 2008-January-04, 11:28
#11
Posted 2008-January-04, 17:02
#12
Posted 2008-January-04, 20:45
#13
Posted 2008-January-04, 21:10
barmar, on Jan 5 2008, 01:02 AM, said:
Since this is posted here, the 2NT bidder or his partner thought that it showed the minors because 1♦ could be short. Just a guess. Some think, for reasons only known to themselves, that it always shows the two lowest suits, unbid or not.
So the same would apply after 1♣.
Roland
#14
Posted 2008-January-05, 03:40
#15
Posted 2008-January-07, 16:08

Help
