As simple as it gets
#1
Posted 2007-December-30, 12:42
♠ 98
♥ 76
♦ JT94
♣ AQ862
at IMPS. The opponents bid
1N - 2♥
2♠ - 3N
What's your lead?
#2
Posted 2007-December-30, 12:56
Which one is a matter of
agreement.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#4
Posted 2007-December-30, 13:04
#6
Posted 2007-December-30, 14:09
#8
Posted 2007-December-30, 15:19
SoTired, on Dec 30 2007, 03:09 PM, said:
If the 1N opener is RHO, then leading a ♣ may cost a trick. You want =partner= to lead ♣'s =through= RHO and into you hand if RHO is the 1N opener.
Natural lead from the given hand is the DJ from JT9x
#9
Posted 2007-December-30, 15:21
#10
Posted 2007-December-30, 15:21
#11
Posted 2007-December-30, 15:24
foo, on Dec 30 2007, 04:19 PM, said:
SoTired, on Dec 30 2007, 03:09 PM, said:
If the 1N opener is RHO, then leading a ♣ may cost a trick. You want =partner= to lead ♣'s =through= RHO and into you hand if RHO is the 1N opener.
Natural lead from the given hand is the DJ from JT9x
cough... At matchpoints I would have a lot of sympathy for a diamond lead. At imps, never. Lead a club, and hope partner can get in and has two or more clubs. A club gives us a reasonable chance to set up four winners in that suit. AT imps I am not trying to keep from blowing an overtrick, I am trying to gain enough tricks to set the contract.
#12
Posted 2007-December-30, 15:45
#13 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-December-30, 19:18
#14
Posted 2007-December-30, 19:36
Jlall, on Dec 30 2007, 05:18 PM, said:
I think the ♣ is best, but I'm curious about the ♦ at MPs. Not only does it seem less lucrative but I'd be worried we aren't getting any field protection on the opening lead.
#15
Posted 2007-December-30, 20:17
#17
Posted 2007-December-31, 04:23
#18
Posted 2008-January-01, 09:45
FrancesHinden, on Dec 31 2007, 05:23 AM, said:
Bridge by parable? I dare say that if the contract was 4S rather than 3N, no one would be leading a ♣ from AQxxx on this auction; and we all know why.
"4th down from your longest and strongest" does not come close to describing the actual complexity of choosing an opening lead.
Underleading A's and AQ's can cost vs NT contracts as well as vs suit contracts.
The opening lead is definitely the hardest play in Bridge to get right, and clearly one can construct boards where what we need to do here is lead a Major! However, the issue is what is not what is going to work, but rather what is most likely to work.
I don't =know= what is most likely to work, and neither does anyone else who is honest about it. I think a ♣ or a ♦ is most likely to.
And I don't think it is as clear cut as simply tallying the responses might given the impression of.
Another situation where it would be interesting for a good simulation to be done.
#19
Posted 2008-January-01, 11:02
foo, on Jan 1 2008, 10:45 AM, said:
The responses are based on experience, which from all the respondants I would bet totals over a million hands of bridge. For such a simple problem (common auction, unexceptional hand) that's as accurate as you can get.
#20
Posted 2008-January-01, 11:15
foo, on Jan 1 2008, 05:45 PM, said:
I did a simulation yesterday and clubs was the best lead (diamonds was second best, but it was not close).

Help
