small slam
#1
Posted 2007-December-28, 08:50
♠K74
♥Q62
♦Q8653
♣42
♠AQJ962
♥AK
♦K10
♣AQ7
lead: ♥10
#2
Posted 2007-December-28, 10:10
#3
Posted 2007-December-28, 10:19
pclayton, on Dec 28 2007, 11:10 AM, said:
I wasnt sure which forum to post it in
Probably should have picked Interesting Bridge Hands for that reason....I dont suppose theres a way to switch it?
#4
Posted 2007-December-28, 11:48
EDIT: if RHO has the Ace, we'll have to rely on the ♣ finesse.
#5
Posted 2007-December-28, 11:48
pclayton, on Dec 28 2007, 11:10 AM, said:
If I've done the math right, your suggestion is 67.5%. You win if diamonds are 3-3, or if diamonds are 4-2 and trumps are 2-2. You can fall back on the club finesse only if LHO hold the dA. Thus its about 50-50 half the time and about 75% half the time.
#6
Posted 2007-December-28, 11:51
If is taken by left hand opponent, who is smart enough to not return a ♥, I win a trump in hand and cross to the q♦ if they break 5-1 or worse i will have to rely on the club finesse, ruff a ♦ high play, home if they break 3-3, otherwise play a trump to the king, if they break 2-2 i can set up 4-2 ♦, otherwise i have to rely on the club finesse. If they return a ♦ I play the same but cash a of trumps before crossing to the king of trumps.
If right hand opponent takes the ace play goes as above unless they play a club when I take the ace and play as above excepting that I can no longer take the club finesse. I think this is better than finessing but quite sure of the odds.
I'm sure there is a better line but i can't see it.
#7
Posted 2007-December-28, 12:43
If RHO has the ♦A I guess I don't have the entries to try to establish the ♦ suit now so I'll have to finesse in clubs. If there's a way to preserve a fork, establishing diamonds, and the ♣ finesse then I don't see it.
#8
Posted 2007-December-28, 13:44
#9
Posted 2007-December-28, 20:05
#10
Posted 2007-December-29, 12:46
jwmonty, on Dec 29 2007, 03:05 AM, said:
Do you always Double on a King without any support?
#11
Posted 2007-December-29, 12:52
Free, on Dec 29 2007, 10:46 AM, said:
jwmonty, on Dec 29 2007, 03:05 AM, said:
Do you always Double on a King without any support?
No but he would in a slam auction to get the lead.
#12 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-December-29, 23:57
pclayton, on Dec 29 2007, 01:52 PM, said:
Free, on Dec 29 2007, 10:46 AM, said:
jwmonty, on Dec 29 2007, 03:05 AM, said:
Do you always Double on a King without any support?
No but he would in a slam auction to get the lead.
he'd tell himself to lead away from a king?
#13
Posted 2007-December-30, 08:26
Jlall, on Dec 29 2007, 09:57 PM, said:
pclayton, on Dec 29 2007, 01:52 PM, said:
Free, on Dec 29 2007, 10:46 AM, said:
jwmonty, on Dec 29 2007, 03:05 AM, said:
Do you always Double on a King without any support?
No but he would in a slam auction to get the lead.
he'd tell himself to lead away from a king?
RHO had the chance to double 5♣.
We are playing the hand.
That makes LHO the opening leader. I posted a handy link for you:
Wiki article on who makes the Opening Lead
#14
Posted 2007-December-30, 11:25
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."

Help
