BBO Discussion Forums: Openers rebid - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Openers rebid

#1 User is offline   firmit 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 263
  • Joined: 2007-January-26

Posted 2007-December-26, 09:01

Is this not textbook

KQJxx
K10
Ax
KQxx

1♠-2♥-3♣?

Partner suggested strongly that I should've bid 3NT. Why not search for a minor suit slam?
"Never increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything." William of Ockham (1285-1349)
0

#2 User is offline   nick_s 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 170
  • Joined: 2007-December-06
  • Location:Chicago, IL

Posted 2007-December-26, 09:05

I agree. You are too strong for 3NT. Partner is still unlimited and slam is possible in any strain but diamonds.
Not an expert, just a student of the game
0

#3 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,204
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-December-26, 09:21

3C.

Shows your shape and your strength.

Depending on your style 3NT may be made
on an ace less.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#4 User is offline   jtfanclub 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,937
  • Joined: 2004-June-05

Posted 2007-December-26, 09:22

I have no idea if it's too strong or not, but don't you want partner to declare 3NT if he has Qx(x) of diamonds? Switch your red suits and I'd be a lot more tempted to blast to 3NT.
0

#5 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-December-26, 09:33

If we are playing 2/1 GF, I would bid 2N. On just about any auction this seems to work out better than starting with 3♣. I am not worried about right-siding game contracts, my concern is to get both a slam invitation across and leave room to find the right strain.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#6 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2007-December-26, 10:04

I prefer 2NT to 3C, but I have no huge problem with 3C. 3C is better for finding 6C if it is on, but 2NT and a later strong bid will describe this hand pretty well (18-19 bal). 2NT will also let partner know I have a doubleton heart.

3NT is a horrible bid; not only does it preempt the auction, it doesn't even describe the hand.
0

#7 User is offline   firmit 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 263
  • Joined: 2007-January-26

Posted 2007-December-26, 10:19

Continuation:
1♠-2♥-3♣-3NT- 4NT!

is 4NT quantitative in this position?
"Never increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything." William of Ockham (1285-1349)
0

#8 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2007-December-26, 10:22

firmit, on Dec 26 2007, 11:19 AM, said:

Continuation:
1♠-2♥-3♣-3NT- 4NT!

is 4NT quantitative in this position?

Yes.
0

#9 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,204
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-December-26, 10:26

firmit, on Dec 26 2007, 11:19 AM, said:

Continuation:
1♠-2♥-3♣-3NT- 4NT!

is 4NT quantitative in this position?

Sure, what else?

Although quantitative does
not make a lot of sense, but
so does ace asking.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users