(1x) - x - (1y) - 2y
(1x) - x - (1y) - p
(2z) - p - (p) - 2y
What is the difference?
Page 1 of 1
auction
#2
Posted 2007-December-12, 11:57
Never thought about it, but I'd say a King to an Ace difference. Assuming the x's and y's are
1♦ - dbl - 1♥ - 2♥
and
1♦ - dbl - 1♥ - pass
2♣ - pass - pass - 2♥
I'd bid 2♥ on the 1st holding: ♠Qxx ♥AQJxx ♦xx ♣xxx
On the 2nd, ♠xxx ♥AQxxx ♦xx ♣xxx looks right to me.
1♦ - dbl - 1♥ - 2♥
and
1♦ - dbl - 1♥ - pass
2♣ - pass - pass - 2♥
I'd bid 2♥ on the 1st holding: ♠Qxx ♥AQJxx ♦xx ♣xxx
On the 2nd, ♠xxx ♥AQxxx ♦xx ♣xxx looks right to me.
"Phil" on BBO
#3
Posted 2007-December-12, 11:57
auction 1 should show a stronger hand
auction 2 is more like a distributional hand
auction 2 is more like a distributional hand
#4
Posted 2007-December-12, 12:04
Auction 1 is stronger.
(although it's hard to think of a hand that can't double 1y but is prepared to bid 2y next round - so it's also possible in an inexperienced partnership that 4th hand is worried that partner will misinterpret 2y on the first round)
(although it's hard to think of a hand that can't double 1y but is prepared to bid 2y next round - so it's also possible in an inexperienced partnership that 4th hand is worried that partner will misinterpret 2y on the first round)
#5
Posted 2007-December-12, 12:22
FrancesHinden, on Dec 12 2007, 01:04 PM, said:
Auction 1 is stronger.
(although it's hard to think of a hand that can't double 1y but is prepared to bid 2y next round - so it's also possible in an inexperienced partnership that 4th hand is worried that partner will misinterpret 2y on the first round)
(although it's hard to think of a hand that can't double 1y but is prepared to bid 2y next round - so it's also possible in an inexperienced partnership that 4th hand is worried that partner will misinterpret 2y on the first round)
Ah okay, I think your explanation in parentheses describes what was actually meant at the table. Takeout doubler was relatively weak player, 2S bidder a very strong player.
Page 1 of 1

Help
