BBO Discussion Forums: Couple Easy ones - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Couple Easy ones

#1 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,725
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2007-November-23, 14:39

Couple IMP problems

Hand 1:

The opponents have the following prosaic auction to 4♥

1♥ - 2♥
3♥ - 4♥

What do you lead from

♠ K3
♥ T9
♦ J987
♣ AQ943

Hand 2:

You hold

♠ K52
♥ JT5
♦ 7
♣ AQJ875

The auction starts

(2♥) - 2♠ - 3♦ - ???

What's your call?
Alderaan delenda est
0

#2 User is online   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,407
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-November-23, 14:53

1) H
2) 4D
0

#3 User is online   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,029
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2007-November-23, 15:12

1. A guess. I would know more, at the table, than I do now. I'd know what 3♥ meant or, if the answer were 'undiscussed' at least I'd know that responder was guessing as well.

The safe lead is the heart, but is surrenders tempo to declarer. It gives no trick away, but it may give away time...

The aggressive lead is the spade K. I'd never consider the spade at mps, but I think I'd lead this here. I would not ever lead either minor... I think they are more dangerous, each in their own way, than the spade.

Ask me again tomorrow, and I'll probably lead a trump :)

2. 4♠. I'd need a 4th trump to bid 4♦.. this hand isn't anything special so far.

I'd like to bid 4♣ 'fit-showing' but adjective bridge is not yet legal. I am worried about RHO bidding 5♥ next time, but I will deal with that later (while maybe later regretting my current decision)
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#4 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2007-November-23, 16:09

1. Trump. This is clear to me, as opps gave hints of a ruffing game and no side suits.

2. Depends on agreements. Without any, I'll just try 4♠.
0

#5 User is offline   foo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,380
  • Joined: 2003-September-24

Posted 2007-November-24, 00:50

1= It might not be the right lead, but the natural lead from
♠K3 ♥T9 ♦J987 ♣AQ943
is the D9 (or D8 depending on your agreements on leads from honor holdings.)

2= The auction starts
(2♥) - 2♠ - (3♦) - ??
You hold
♠K52 ♥JT5 ♦7 ♣AQJ875

I agree with mikeh that 4D seems a bit much.

OTOH, I am not sanguine about a simple 4S bid either.

In the right partnerships, I can bid 4C in this auction as a Fit Showing Non Jump.
0

#6 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2007-November-24, 02:31

1: ♥10, I don't see any good alternatives
2: 4♣, FNJ
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#7 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2007-November-24, 06:12

1. A tough one. Anything but a ♣ are clear alternatives. I'd normally lead ♠K or ♥T at the table - both equally possible. ♦7 (or 8 according to agreements) is a third, but more distant alternative.

2. Playing FNJ (I don't) this is an easy 4♣ I believe.
You can bid 4♣ without playing FNJ too, but then you run the risk of not being able to support partner lower than the 5-level, which is too tough. I'll go for 4♠ to show my support and preemt opps auction a little.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#8 User is offline   cjames 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 195
  • Joined: 2007-April-02
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Norway

Posted 2007-November-24, 06:16

1. ♥
2. I think I would just blast 4♠, 4♣ with FNJ available.
Squeeze me
0

#9 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,225
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-November-24, 07:47

#1 trumps, I want to go passive
give me a lead more passive than trumps,
and I take that, but I dont see one
#2 4D, may be usefull, if they bid 5D, but
I think 4S is also ok, and 4C for that matter.
The adv. of 4D is, that it will create a forcing pass
situation, I am not sure, that this is also the case
with 4C or 4S.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#10 User is offline   mcphee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,514
  • Joined: 2003-February-16

Posted 2007-November-24, 07:55

Like Mighty Mike I would not mind banging down the K s having considered my excuses. I do not mind aggressive leads like this at imps and it may not be so costly. Leads from Js' have never been very thrilling.

Would be nice to bid 4C and I think this is what we need to do as it should have a fit with S most days.
0

#11 User is offline   Winstonm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,289
  • Joined: 2005-January-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tulsa, Oklahoma
  • Interests:Art, music

Posted 2007-November-24, 09:50

1) H10 - adopting a passive defensive strategy and hoping not give anything away rather than an attempt to cut down on ruffs.
2) 4S - the practical call when pressured.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
0

#12 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2007-November-26, 01:52

1. a Heart. I sit behind the stronger hand, so we may simply beat this on pure power.

2. 4 ♠ even if I had been able to bid 4 Club, I had not done it. I want them to judge at the 5. Level whether or not they have a fit in a red suit.
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#13 User is offline   brianshark 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 895
  • Joined: 2006-May-13
  • Location:Dublin
  • Interests:Artificial Intelligence, Computer Games, Satire, Football, Rugby... and Bridge I suppose.

Posted 2007-November-26, 09:16

1. ♥T, safe leads against tight games.
2. 4♦ if partner is a conservative bidder because over the inevitable 4♥/5♦ raise, it helps the descisions to bid on or double. 4♠ if partner likes bidding slams because he may get excited and get us too high and our hand isn't that good.
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users