Posted 2007-November-15, 22:48
OK. Not much here to analyze, but there is something.
I also will win the second spade. However, I need to play a card from dummy.
I do not want to pitch a heart. That would snip communications if the diamond Ace fells the stiff Queen.
I do not want to pitch a club, because that kills my remote chance of catching LHO with something like ♠xx ♥xxxx ♦Qxx ♣AKxx. If he has that, I'll eventually take five heart, one spade, two diamonds, and one club, for nine tricks. They will cash one spade, one diamond, and two clubs. Adds up for making. (I do not know when I win trick two that LHO has a third spade; RHO might have ♠AJ10xxx ♥xxx ♦x ♣xx and be timid.)
I do not want to ditch a diamond. If the diamonds come in, we lose trick one, win trick two, win the next six diamonds, and then win four hearts. We lose trick 13 if hearts split 5-1 unless (1) RHO strangely has five hearts and the AJ10-whatever in spades or (2) LHO has the fifth heart and both the Ace and King of clubs.
A small heart pitch seems worst. Thus, it seems that I must decide first whether to maximize chances of making this contract at all costs (ditch the diamond) or whether the contract and initial defense is obvious, or what impact the uncertainty as to contract and initial defense might have. Then, I must evaluate the relative frequency of the non-squeeze 5-1 heart split and the relative frequency of the club honor concentration plus the 2-7 spade split. Plus, I'm concerned about that club 10 and all the inferences to be gleaned therefrom, weighed against the extremely remote possibility that RHO is playing a really deep game falsecard to suggest that club honor, and not duck the first spade for that matter, with seven spades in his hand.
Wow. I suppose I just ditch the club, but these are the sorts of silly problems that sometimes drive partners of mine crazy sitting as dummy across from me for intolerable minutes.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.