Posted 2007-November-14, 07:20
I would have opened 1♦, or 1♣ if 1♦ promises unbalanced, the first time, planning a 2NT rebid. This hand is too strong for 1NT, IMO.
However, if I did open 1NT, I would have cue'd the first time as a super-acceptance. I have a primed-out monster with a well-placed distributional value.
If I boxed myself in twice, I'd cue at the five-level and hope that partner understood that I was a two-time pansy.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
P-(P)-1N-(2♠)
3♥-(3♠)-4♥-(4♠)
P-(P)-?