BBO Discussion Forums: we missed game :( - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

we missed game :(

#1 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2007-November-05, 00:19

Scoring: MP


p-p-(1D)-2D*
(3D)-3S**-p-p***
p

*=Michaels, intermediate or better
**=overbid
***=spectacular underbid

LHO leads the Ace of diamonds, and RHO plays the 3, showing interest or an even number, the opps aren't sure. You play the 9 and LHO, after some consideration, switches to the 2 of clubs (135). Your play (opps aren't extremely good).
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#2 User is offline   matmat 

  • ded
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,459
  • Joined: 2005-August-11
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2007-November-05, 00:35

between trumps breaking 4-1 or opps finding their heart ruff is game even that good? (assuming they actually cash their side suit winners...)
0

#3 User is offline   brianshark 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 895
  • Joined: 2006-May-13
  • Location:Dublin
  • Interests:Artificial Intelligence, Computer Games, Satire, Football, Rugby... and Bridge I suppose.

Posted 2007-November-05, 06:27

Looking at all cards it's dodgy but tbh I think I'll always bid it. Don't think I'd want to pass as south so 3 looks alright, and given partner makes a free-bid in spades, N should really raise to 4 with his extras.

As to the play, I can't see a safety play if trumps are 4-1. Maybe play hearts right away because it can only cost if a is ruffed with a singleton .
The difference between theory and practice is that in theory, there is no difference between theory and practice, but in practice, there is.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users