email hand
#1
Posted 2007-November-01, 13:04
They are VUL, you are NOT:
3Hby LHO, Double by partner pass.
You hold: QTx,J9xx,10x,ATxx.
Your thoughts, please."
#3
Posted 2007-November-01, 13:35
-P.J. Painter.
#4
Posted 2007-November-01, 13:58
Mark me down for a prosaic 4C.
#7
Posted 2007-November-01, 14:29
#8
Posted 2007-November-01, 15:34
Mark me down for a pass. +200 looks like a reasonable gamble.
#9
Posted 2007-November-01, 15:37
I'm more concerned about who my partner is. White on red, short hearts? I might laugh when I see his hand.
-P.J. Painter.
#10
Posted 2007-November-01, 16:23
kenrexford, on Nov 1 2007, 10:37 PM, said:
I'm more concerned about who my partner is. White on red, short hearts? I might laugh when I see his hand.
Pass then. You don't have to look at it displayed in all it's "beauty" as dummy.
Harald
#11
Posted 2007-November-01, 17:16
Obviously it could be right to pass even if 3♥X usually makes if bidding on is even more likely to get us to a bad score, but there's no strong reason to think the auction is unusual and 4♣X-3 (-500) is still a better score than -730.
I would bid 3NT here, hoping to avoid the double. If partner has extras I could easily make, and if not it seems that -150 could be a good result on the board (if opponents don't find a double).
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#12
Posted 2007-November-01, 20:04
awm, on Nov 1 2007, 06:16 PM, said:
Obviously it could be right to pass even if 3♥X usually makes if bidding on is even more likely to get us to a bad score, but there's no strong reason to think the auction is unusual and 4♣X-3 (-500) is still a better score than -730.
I would bid 3NT here, hoping to avoid the double. If partner has extras I could easily make, and if not it seems that -150 could be a good result on the board (if opponents don't find a double).
If partner tends to have a singleton heart, your hearts can't be picked up if partner's is singleton A K Q T or dummy's is singleton A K Q T, not to mention all the other times they can't be picked up (dummy void, no quick dummy entry, unlikely but possible dummy something like QT doubleton.) The combination of all these chances (meaning everything combined except declarer AKQTxxx and dummy not void) is extremely high.
If partner has enough to make 3NT at all comfortable he will raise you even higher.
I truly think when you say 3♥X almost always makes when you pass here, it is some combination of bad doubles by your partner, bad luck, and bad memory. Really the only time I'm not confident is when partner is minimum and we have a big club fit, which in combination is pretty bad lucky since obviously he is more likely to be long in diamonds.
And on top of all that, it's MPs and they are vul? I really can't understand anything but pass.
#13
Posted 2007-November-02, 01:19
I would even pass this at imps, at mps there is no alternative for me.
And I don´t need to know my lho, I just need to know my partner.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#14
Posted 2007-November-02, 05:04

Help
