BBO Discussion Forums: Just curious - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Just curious

#21 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,067
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2007-October-27, 14:02

Quote

The alert chart is meant to be read and interpreted by people with general understanding of bridge bidding.


The alert chart makes assumptions about what constitutes "general understanding of bridge bidding". Those assumptions are unlikely to be universally valid, and in any case have no place in an alert regulation.

A 13 count "weak two bid" in fourth seat wouldn't surprise me at all. It would surprise a good percentage of the members of my local Tuesday club game.

A 17 count "weak two bid" in fourth seat would definitely surprise me. For me, such a hand borders on "too strong to overcall at the one level". Calling it a "weak two" is ridiculous.

I think the TD who told Adam to "call me back if it comes up" had his head up his ass.
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

#22 User is offline   Mbodell 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,871
  • Joined: 2007-April-22
  • Location:Santa Clara, CA

Posted 2007-October-28, 00:48

blackshoe, on Oct 27 2007, 03:02 PM, said:

Quote

The alert chart is meant to be read and interpreted by people with general understanding of bridge bidding.


A 17 count "weak two bid" in fourth seat would definitely surprise me. For me, such a hand borders on "too strong to overcall at the one level". Calling it a "weak two" is ridiculous.

I think the TD who told Adam to "call me back if it comes up" had his head up his ass.

But did anyone call it a weak 2? With most of my partners, playing standard American, we've played that in the fourth seat when passed to preempts are very, very conservative/constructive (since no need to go negative when you can get 0) and that 2 bids in particular are not preempts and are stronger than 1 bids (unlike in any other seat). 16-20 points or 6 LTC and 6+ cards in suit.
0

#23 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,520
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2007-October-28, 01:37

Mbodell, on Oct 28 2007, 12:48 AM, said:

But did anyone call it a weak 2?  With most of my partners, playing standard American, we've played that in the fourth seat when passed to preempts are very, very conservative/constructive (since no need to go negative when you can get 0) and that 2 bids in particular are not preempts and are stronger than 1 bids (unlike in any other seat). 16-20 points or 6 LTC and 6+ cards in suit.

I don't know what the standard range for 2M in 4th seat. I play s.th. like 10-12, but other seem to think 11-13 or 12-14 is normal.
(Edit: In particular, 2M is weaker in standard than 1M-2M.)

I think your treatment is sufficiently non-standard that I would alert it (if I ever played it).
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users