BBO Discussion Forums: Room Type Filters for My hands - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Room Type Filters for My hands

Poll: Do you think having a check box for myhands to filter type of game would be useful (9 member(s) have cast votes)

Do you think having a check box for myhands to filter type of game would be useful

  1. Yes, filters for main room, team game, and tournaments (1 votes [11.11%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.11%

  2. Yes, filter for main room, and combined team and tournaments (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. Yes, filters for main room and tournaments (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. Yes, some other combination of room filters (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  5. Yes, a combination of room filters plus option to find specific partner (7 votes [77.78%])

    Percentage of vote: 77.78%

  6. NO, myhands is fine the way it is. (1 votes [11.11%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.11%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   inquiry 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 14,566
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amelia Island, FL
  • Interests:Bridge, what else?

Posted 2007-October-18, 18:16

I posed this as a poll just to see if there was any interest. I for one, have a need to sort hands into tournaments events, as opposed to team games or main room. I would also like the option of looking for hands with a specific partner. But I don't know how to go about it in software, so this might be a daunting task, or might slow the myhands site too much if programmed in this manner. I also know how to pull the hands into excel and do all this via macro's and to use Bridgebrowser for data a few weeks old or older, so it is not that PRESSING a need for me. I was just wondering if such a feature would be useful to anyone else beside me.

Of course, it may not be feasible, but it is a suggestion I would like to make. :)
--Ben--

#2 User is offline   Elianna 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,437
  • Joined: 2004-August-29
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Switzerland

Posted 2007-October-18, 21:05

I would like an option that was just about filtering by partner. That's why I voted for the option that includes that, but frankly, I couldn't care less about the other parts (I wouldn't mind if choices were included, but I'm not clamoring for them).
My addiction to Mario Bros #3 has come back!
0

#3 User is offline   matmat 

  • ded
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,459
  • Joined: 2005-August-11
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2007-October-18, 21:53

i'd like to be able to filter by how well i thought I played ;), but i'll settle by p.
0

#4 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,401
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2007-October-18, 22:42

matmat, on Oct 19 2007, 05:53 AM, said:

i'd like to be able to filter by how well i thought I played ;), but i'll settle by p.

If standard list components were used, you could sort on IMPs.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#5 User is offline   matmat 

  • ded
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,459
  • Joined: 2005-August-11
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2007-October-19, 00:03

helene_t, on Oct 18 2007, 11:42 PM, said:

If standard list components were used, you could sort on IMPs.

IMPs are not a foolproof indicator of quality of play.
0

#6 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2007-October-19, 01:58

myhands is just fine i think...
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#7 User is offline   Mr. Dodgy 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 390
  • Joined: 2005-March-22
  • Location:Brisbane, Australia
  • Interests:Bridge (duh), mathematics, Information Technology, fantasy fiction and role-playing games, flirting with girls, eight-ball pool and snooker, dancing, drinking, The Simpsons, House, Futurama, The X-Files...

Posted 2007-October-19, 02:43

I believe myhands could be jazzed up in many quite simple ways - sort/filter by scoring, score, partner, contract, declarer, tricks (needed, won, amount over/under), whether we were on defense or offence...
0

#8 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,401
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2007-October-19, 02:45

Mr. Dodgy, on Oct 19 2007, 10:43 AM, said:

I believe myhands could be jazzed up in many quite simple ways - sort/filter by scoring, score, partner, contract, declarer, tricks (needed, won, amount over/under), whether we were on defense or offence...

Don't you get this functionality (and more) if you buy BridgeBrowser?
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#9 User is offline   Mr. Dodgy 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 390
  • Joined: 2005-March-22
  • Location:Brisbane, Australia
  • Interests:Bridge (duh), mathematics, Information Technology, fantasy fiction and role-playing games, flirting with girls, eight-ball pool and snooker, dancing, drinking, The Simpsons, House, Futurama, The X-Files...

Posted 2007-October-19, 02:53

I'm sure you do, and I understand BrBr to be a very good product with great capabilities for analysing hand data. I'd love to have it :)

I have my own myhands database, and can perform any of the functions I have listed (and more) using it.

It's no great achievement, and I'm sure it would not be very difficult to add some small extra filters, etc. into the online version.
0

#10 User is offline   Gerben42 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,577
  • Joined: 2005-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Erlangen, Germany
  • Interests:Astronomy, Mathematics
    Nuclear power

Posted 2007-October-19, 04:20

I like the idea of splitting into "main room", tourneys and teammatches.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do!
My Bridge Systems Page

BC Kultcamp Rieneck
0

#11 User is offline   inquiry 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Admin
  • Posts: 14,566
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amelia Island, FL
  • Interests:Bridge, what else?

Posted 2007-October-19, 10:44

helene_t, on Oct 19 2007, 03:45 AM, said:

Mr. Dodgy, on Oct 19 2007, 10:43 AM, said:

I believe myhands could be jazzed up in many quite simple ways - sort/filter by scoring, score, partner, contract, declarer, tricks (needed, won, amount over/under), whether we were on defense or offence...

Don't you get this functionality (and more) if you buy BridgeBrowser?

you do
--Ben--
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users