BBO Discussion Forums: Weinstein fair play - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Weinstein fair play

#21 User is online   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,067
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2007-October-18, 20:44

mrdct, on Oct 18 2007, 09:35 PM, said:

In my particular case, the event was at a stage where a field of about 120 had been reduced to 6 teams who were then playing a round-robin to determine 2 teams to progress to the next stage. This was the 3rd of the 5 matches for that stage and all 5 teams were very much in contention to qualify at that point, so a decision about whether or not to take advantage of the penalty card had the propensity to affect all of the other teams (i.e. "the field").

In most ACBL events, AFAIK, the conditions of contest specify that a contestant is required to play each board to win that board. This rule was devised to disallow "dumping" when that might be advantageous, but it could be argued that the rule also applies to requesting waivers when that might be disadvantageous.

IAC, since there is nothing in the laws of the game about considering "the field" in such decisions, it seems to me those considerations are at best extra-legal.
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users